Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

B7478 - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Oleksiy Naumov View Post
    I'd never crop a photo the way you've just suggested. It might need to be moved a bit down , but certainly not this much, imho.
    Yes indeed, just lower it slightly will do but definitely not too much.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by BaszB View Post
      Yes indeed, just lower it slightly will do but definitely not too much.
      Yes, it's because the crop ratio from the example is not the best as I do not have the orignal file. I only send the image to say that all the sides need to has a equal distance. Already deleted to not being confuse.

      Thank guys!

      Cheers,

      Vinicius

      Comment


      • #18
        The first thing to say is that the expression of following the rules of JetPhotos in this regard is not correct. I read how the plane had to be centered in one of the links that appear in some topic in the forum, which, even though I searched for it today, I have not found it. I will follow the suggestion by lowering the plane a little.
        Thanks for the help.

        Comment


        • #19
          Dark/Underexposed rejection

          This photo has been rejected by Dark / Underexposed. I consider that both visually and watching the histogram does not fit that conclusion. Any opinion will be welcome.
          Thank you.
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6917400

          Comment


          • #20
            This looks acceptable, I have accepted the picture

            Regards

            Alex

            Comment


            • #21
              Thanks for your quick response.
              Regards.

              Comment


              • #22
                Hello
                This photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7041874 was rejected the first time by "too much or too little contrast".
                I corrected the photo and it was rejected again for the same reason.
                Any help to solve the rejection?
                Thank you.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Picture was wrongly rejected and has now been accepted

                  Regards
                  Alex

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Thank you.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hello,
                      This photo has been rejected by undersharpened (soft). https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7059115
                      I see the license plate (EI-DHZ) and the rest of the plane sharpened, so I ask where the problem is.
                      Thank you.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by B7478 View Post
                        Hello,
                        This photo has been rejected by undersharpened (soft). https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7059115
                        I see the license plate (EI-DHZ) and the rest of the plane sharpened, so I ask where the problem is.
                        Thank you.
                        Whole image is just a little soft. This can be seen everywhere (tail, winglet, nose, etc..)

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Thanks for the reply.
                          Greetings.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Hello,
                            I have always marked Air Transat aircraft with this livery as "Special Scheme": https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9220524, but in this photo there is an annotation:
                            Screener's comments: not a Special Scheme.
                            What should I do in the future?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              In case of doubt just leave a msg like "not sure if it's special scheme or not, please correct if needed"
                              In such case we'll always correct it for you
                              Here it's a scheme visible on multiples regs so not special

                              Cheers
                              Alex

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Thank you.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X