Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AndrewL - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi

    Had this picture rejected for Over Processed / Bad postprocessing, the color and exposure look OK. Any help appreciated.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7936951

    Once again did not get submission email.

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi

    Had this picture rejected for 'Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)'

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7933141

    I used the usual white balance with light room, not sure which way to go, to me the histogram looks OK.

    Note, i did not receive an email re this submission.

    TIA
    Andrew
    Very strong cyan cast. Does the sky really look like that?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	33614_1582421389.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	566.2 KB
ID:	1082274

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi

    Had this picture rejected for 'Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)'

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7933141

    I used the usual white balance with light room, not sure which way to go, to me the histogram looks OK.

    Note, i did not receive an email re this submission.

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for contrast.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7855946
    If i increase the contrast i think it would be too dark.
    Any comments appreciated.
    Contrast weak. Horizon also a little off.

    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    I had this picture rejected for processing and colors.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7855930
    I used the white swirl on the tail for white balance but is it too yellow? As for the bad processing is this because of the colors or sharpening?
    Any comments appreciated.
    Red/magenta tint. Top part of sky appears to have been darkened = bad processing.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for contrast.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7855946
    If i increase the contrast i think it would be too dark.
    Any comments appreciated.
    TIA
    Andrew
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for processing and colors.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7855930
    I used the white swirl on the tail for white balance but is it too yellow? As for the bad processing is this because of the colors or sharpening?
    Any comments appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew
    Last edited by dlowwa; 2020-01-29, 08:59.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I have a new lens which has different characteristics to my other lenses. When i import and do a dust check everything has a red tinge. I use my normal processing and white balance correction. I find i need to go the opposite way I would expect for white balance (more yellow rather than more blue). Any advice would be appreciated. The pictures were taken at sunset.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29309[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29310[/ATTACH]
    TIA
    Andrew
    Last time I'm going to make this request:

    Please read here carefully, especially #2 & 4

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    In the future, any new threads that you open requesting prescreening will simply be deleted. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Pre Screening Advice

    Hi All

    I have a new lens which has different characteristics to my other lenses. When i import and do a dust check everything has a red tinge. I use my normal processing and white balance correction. I find i need to go the opposite way I would expect for white balance (more yellow rather than more blue). Any advice would be appreciated. The pictures were taken at sunset.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	QLK DH8C VH-SBW #2 1011 YPAD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.5 KB
ID:	1043336Click image for larger version

Name:	UTY F50 VH-FKX #2 1011 YPAD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	408.0 KB
ID:	1043337
    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for bad color https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7582231
    which i fixed (increased blue) and now i get it rejected for bad processing https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7605037

    What have i done wrong or need to do to fix it? any help will be appreciated.
    TIA
    Andrew
    Bad edit of the sky looks like. You've done something extra to the second version to cause that.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for bad color https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7582231
    which i fixed (increased blue) and now i get it rejected for bad processing https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7605037

    What have i done wrong or need to do to fix it? any help will be appreciated.
    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I have had this picture rejected twice for 'Too Much to Little Contrast' I have increased the contrast level both times. Does the picture need more contrast or less?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7543778

    TIA
    Andrew
    Needs more, though not sure it will be such an easy fix due to the overcast light.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I have had this picture rejected twice for 'Too Much to Little Contrast' I have increased the contrast level both times. Does the picture need more contrast or less?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7543778

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad post processing amongst other reasons. Any advice to what i have done wrong would be much appreciated.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7513726

    TIA
    Andrew
    There's some banding in the sky, but I'd guess that's more a compression related issue than overprocessing, and not really too noticeable in any case. If possible, try saving at a higher quality when you re-submit, though if you already did do that, then you might need to reprocess the image to truly get rid of the banding.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad post processing amongst other reasons. Any advice to what i have done wrong would be much appreciated.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7513726

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for 'halo's'. I have examined all the sharpened edges and can find no indication of halo's, what am i missing?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7500509

    TIA
    Andrew
    No halos are visible. Image has been accepted now, sorry for the inconvenience.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for 'halo's'. I have examined all the sharpened edges and can find no indication of halo's, what am i missing?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7500509

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X