AndrewL - editing advice

[dlowwa]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for Over/Bad Processing. I applied my normal workflow so not sure what needs to be done to fix it.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8487560

TIA
Andrew

Editing halos are visible. You should process the image so that there are no halos.

[AndrewL]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for Over/Bad Processing. I applied my normal workflow so not sure what needs to be done to fix it.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8487560

TIA
Andrew

[AndrewL]

Hi All

Regarding my previous post, I too thought it was part of the stabilizer (and missed it) but it was a dust spot. I am guessing that was the problem.

Andrew

[dlowwa]

Hi All

This picture was rejected for Dust spots and Digital manipulation. The dust spot is easily enough removed but i am unsure about the digital manipulation.
I only have Light Room. After the lens correction my process is white balance, exposure, contrast, light tones and sharpening.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8446925

TIA
Andrew

Appears to be poor dust removal, but if that's a natural effect on the stabilizer let me know, and I will see that the rejection is overturned.

[MQ1131]

Hi All

This picture was rejected for Dust spots and Digital manipulation. The dust spot is easily enough removed but i am unsure about the digital manipulation.
I only have Light Room. After the lens correction my process is white balance, exposure, contrast, light tones and sharpening.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8446925

TIA
Andrew

Hi, I noticed that there are something unusal on the horizontal stabilizer. You might want to avoid that next time.

[AndrewL]

Hi All

This picture was rejected for Dust spots and Digital manipulation. The dust spot is easily enough removed but i am unsure about the digital manipulation.
I only have Light Room. After the lens correction my process is white balance, exposure, contrast, light tones and sharpening.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8446925

TIA
Andrew

[dlowwa]

HI All

I have had this picture rejected twice for over exposure. The histogram looks OK (spread over full length) but it needs less exposure?

Correct. Most of the aircraft is nearly blown out.

[AndrewL]

HI All

I have had this picture rejected twice for over exposure. The histogram looks OK (spread over full length) but it needs less exposure?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8382997

TIA
Andrew

[dlowwa]

Hi all

I have had this picture rejected twice for too much too little contrast. Last time I increased the contrast but it still needs more?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8325159

TIA
Andrew

Close to acceptable for me, though yes, the contrast is a bit weak - look at the shadows below the aircraft.

[AndrewL]

Hi all

I have had this picture rejected twice for too much too little contrast. Last time I increased the contrast but it still needs more?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8325159

TIA
Andrew

[dlowwa]

Hi all

I had the two following pictures rejected for horizontal unlevel. I used the corners of the buildings to get the vertical as the lamp posts are all over the place. I have checked my source pictures and the building corners are vertical. What am i supposed to reference too?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8203970

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8203983

Thanks in advance.
Andrew

ALL verticals (lamp posts and buildings) are leaning right. Both need CCW rotation.

[AndrewL]

Hi all

I had the two following pictures rejected for horizontal unlevel. I used the corners of the buildings to get the vertical as the lamp posts are all over the place. I have checked my source pictures and the building corners are vertical. What am i supposed to reference too?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8203970

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8203983

Thanks in advance.
Andrew

[LX-A343]

The aircraft is clearly too high in the frame. There is far more dead space below the aircraft.

[AndrewL]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for horizon and centering.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8111088

The horizon was set to the runway in the top background. I centered the aircraft between the the two wingtips.
I appealed and was told the aircraft is not centered vertically however the gap between the front of the fusalage and rear fusalage are the same (as per guidelines) I do not know where to go now?

TIA
Andrew

[NYspotter]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected due to contrast issues. The screeners comment was that the darker tones are too low, this i can see on the RGB histogram.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8086442

The picture may have been taken on a hazy day but i can usually fix that with de-hazing and contrast increase. I have tried tweeking the blues (being the darker tone) in lightroom but am unable to increase the height of the darker tones on the histogram. Increasing the contrast did not appear to have any effect (only widened the histogram). Or is the picture even salvageable?

TIA
Andrew

Contrast is poor. You could try to use shadows tool because its background is ground, not sky