AndrewL - editing advice

[MarkLawrence]

I'm not a screener, but when using the dust tool in JP, I see something around the antenna and also the wheels that could be thought of as halos.

[AndrewL]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for over exposure, bad processing and contrast.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9396754

It was taken at sunset and flagged as a night shot.
The histogram is spread across the graph (not clipped) any advice how to fix would be welcomed.
TIA
Andrew

[RobertMahar15]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for over exposure, bad processing and contrast.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9396754

It was taken at sunset and flagged as a night shot.
The histogram is spread across the graph (not clipped) any advice how to fix would be welcomed.
TIA
Andrew

Reducing the exposure would one fix the "overexposed" rejection and possibly the "too much or too little contrast" rejection along with it.

on the other hand, you would have to figure out whats giving you the bad processing on your images. It's most likely that your "shadows" and "highlights" are turned up way too far, So just simply turn them down.

[dlowwa]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for over exposure, bad processing and contrast.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9396754

It was taken at sunset and flagged as a night shot.
The histogram is spread across the graph (not clipped) any advice how to fix would be welcomed.
TIA
Andrew

Exposure looks acceptable, though the contrast is too harsh. Light editing halos are visible.

[AndrewL]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10460089

I have checked, there are no haloes, the colors are ok, both histograms ok.
Any advice welcomed.
TIA
Andrew

[MarkLawrence]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10460089

I have checked, there are no haloes, the colors are ok, both histograms ok.
Any advice welcomed.
TIA
Andrew

Something in your process has made the sky very blotchy - if you use the check for dust tool you can see it.

[dlowwa]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10460089

I have checked, there are no haloes, the colors are ok, both histograms ok.
Any advice welcomed.
TIA
Andrew

Halos are in fact visible.

[AndrewL]

Hi All
I had this picture rejected for numerous reasons. Softness, post-processing and jpg artifacts.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10590876

The softness i understand but the image looks sharp even when i magnify 1.5x (and is no worse than other images i submit)
The colors and white balance are good. Both histograms look OK. There are no halos so why the bad post-processing?
I can see no jpg artifacts.

TIA
Andrew

[derizu]

There are no halos so why the bad post-processing?
I can see no jpg artifacts.

Not a screener but if you use the ‘check for dust tool’, it answers both bad post processing/over processed as well as JPEG artifacts. Sky has quite a bit of visible compression, but especially on the top of the fuselage and leading edge of the wing. Also a faint halo around the whole aircraft, especially the tail.

[dlowwa]

Hi All
I had this picture rejected for numerous reasons. Softness, post-processing and jpg artifacts.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10590876

The softness i understand but the image looks sharp even when i magnify 1.5x (and is no worse than other images i submit)
The colors and white balance are good. Both histograms look OK. There are no halos so why the bad post-processing?
I can see no jpg artifacts.

TIA
Andrew

Soft and overprocessed yes, don't really see any compression myself.

[AndrewL]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for over exposure.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11027546

The histogram is evenly distributed across the graph.
What have i missed?

TIA
Andrew

[dlowwa]

Hi All

I had this picture rejected for over exposure.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11027546

The histogram is evenly distributed across the graph.
What have i missed?

TIA
Andrew

Large spike on right of histogram, hardly 'evenly distributed'. Fuselage is blown out.

[AndrewL]

Is this a better exposure?

[dlowwa]

Is this a better exposure?

Exposure better, but much softer.

[Cameron Roberts]

Is this a better exposure?

Hi Andrew. The photo looks better, but is undersharpened (soft)

Thanks
Cameron