Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AndrewL - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    I'm not a screener, but when using the dust tool in JP, I see something around the antenna and also the wheels that could be thought of as halos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	jp.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	666.2 KB
ID:	1119344

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad postprocessing

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9269521

    Not sure why, I checked the image and colours look OK, no halos or jpeg compression?

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I am at a loss to what is required to this picture:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9197499

    Initially i aligned the fuselage to the horizontal but was told 'Leveling horizontally will give you a crooked horizon due to the perspective'

    Within the picture the only horizon reference are the roads/tracks. I leveled horizontally to the average of the roads but was rejected again and the screeners comment 'needs CCW rotation'

    This implies to what i did with the first rejection. I have looked at similar pictures taken in the same area and there appears to be no consistency. Some of the fuselages are horizontal and some are not.

    Any help/guidance would be appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew
    As above, rejection has already been appealed. There will be no further comments from crew.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I am at a loss to what is required to this picture:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9197499

    Initially i aligned the fuselage to the horizontal but was told 'Leveling horizontally will give you a crooked horizon due to the perspective'

    Within the picture the only horizon reference are the roads/tracks. I leveled horizontally to the average of the roads but was rejected again and the screeners comment 'needs CCW rotation'

    This implies to what i did with the first rejection. I have looked at similar pictures taken in the same area and there appears to be no consistency. Some of the fuselages are horizontal and some are not.

    Any help/guidance would be appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for horizon unlevel. I normally level this type of picture to the horizontal of the fuselage. However this time not allowed, but I am not sure what i should have levelled to?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9159475

    TIA
    Andrew
    Rejection has already been appealed and comments left by senior screener.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for horizon unlevel. I normally level this type of picture to the horizontal of the fuselage. However this time not allowed, but I am not sure what i should have levelled to?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9159475

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I have just had these two pictures rejected for Over Processed / Bad processing.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8922439
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8922527

    The colours and exposure look OK, I was careful not to introduce halos. Not sure what is wrong any help to guide me how to fix them will be appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew
    Relatively strong editing halos on those two.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I have just had these two pictures rejected for Over Processed / Bad processing.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8922439
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8922527

    The colours and exposure look OK, I was careful not to introduce halos. Not sure what is wrong any help to guide me how to fix them will be appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    Another picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I looked and cant see any haloing (only reflections). If halos are present i am not sure why they start to appear now as i have not changed my work flow. My understanding is halos can be reduced by less sharpening?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8784296

    TIA
    Andrew
    There is banding visible in the sky. This may be more of a compression issue than processing.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    Another picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I looked and cant see any haloing (only reflections). If halos are present i am not sure why they start to appear now as i have not changed my work flow. My understanding is halos can be reduced by less sharpening?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8784296

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I used my normal work flow, the colors and contrast look ok, not sure what needs to be fixed.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8754676

    TIA
    Andrew
    Editing halos are visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I used my normal work flow, the colors and contrast look ok, not sure what needs to be fixed.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8754676

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected as Undersharpened (Soft). I checked my source and the text was clear and readable.
    Ok, then just add a little sharpening.

    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    I had this picture rejected for many things. I can see the contrast needs to be increased but i would have thought the colors were OK. Regarding the Over Processed / Bad postprocessing I have no idea what i have done wrong.
    Taken through a window I assume? Contrast looks terrible and the colors oversaturated to compensate, with a strong blue tint. Editing halos also visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for many things. I can see the contrast needs to be increased but i would have thought the colors were OK. Regarding the Over Processed / Bad postprocessing I have no idea what i have done wrong.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8697836

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected as Undersharpened (Soft). I checked my source and the text was clear and readable. I have processed the image as normal but still soft?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8700999

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X