Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AndrewL - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    Another picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I looked and cant see any haloing (only reflections). If halos are present i am not sure why they start to appear now as i have not changed my work flow. My understanding is halos can be reduced by less sharpening?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8784296

    TIA
    Andrew
    There is banding visible in the sky. This may be more of a compression issue than processing.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    Another picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I looked and cant see any haloing (only reflections). If halos are present i am not sure why they start to appear now as i have not changed my work flow. My understanding is halos can be reduced by less sharpening?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8784296

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I used my normal work flow, the colors and contrast look ok, not sure what needs to be fixed.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8754676

    TIA
    Andrew
    Editing halos are visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for over processed / bad processing. I used my normal work flow, the colors and contrast look ok, not sure what needs to be fixed.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8754676

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected as Undersharpened (Soft). I checked my source and the text was clear and readable.
    Ok, then just add a little sharpening.

    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    I had this picture rejected for many things. I can see the contrast needs to be increased but i would have thought the colors were OK. Regarding the Over Processed / Bad postprocessing I have no idea what i have done wrong.
    Taken through a window I assume? Contrast looks terrible and the colors oversaturated to compensate, with a strong blue tint. Editing halos also visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for many things. I can see the contrast needs to be increased but i would have thought the colors were OK. Regarding the Over Processed / Bad postprocessing I have no idea what i have done wrong.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8697836

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected as Undersharpened (Soft). I checked my source and the text was clear and readable. I have processed the image as normal but still soft?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8700999

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had the following picture rejected for contrast and bad color. The contrast is easy to fix but there are are no white references for white balance (I don't usually use the clouds). Not sure which way to go. The blue sky appears to be OK.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8678269

    TIA
    Andrew
    I think the color is actually not that bad..maybe a touch oversaturated, but mostly it's that there are a lot of odd colors all thrown together in that image. Bump up the contrast a bit and desaturated just a touch and might ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had the following picture rejected for contrast and bad color. The contrast is easy to fix but there are are no white references for white balance (I don't usually use the clouds). Not sure which way to go. The blue sky appears to be OK.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8678269

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had the following two pictures rejected for dark/under exposed. I usually center the peak of the histogram. I shouldn't be doing this?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8590030

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8590094

    The last picture was also rejected for over processed/bad processing. Not sure what i did wrong here.

    TIA
    Andrew
    Both are definitely dark. Huge gap on the right of the histogram for both.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had the following two pictures rejected for dark/under exposed. I usually center the peak of the histogram. I shouldn't be doing this?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8590030

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8590094

    The last picture was also rejected for over processed/bad processing. Not sure what i did wrong here.

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    My question: is the picture salvageable
    When the exterior is that badly blown out, probably not

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I have had this picture rejected 3 times for over exposure. Each submission i have reduced the exposure.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8534162

    Not sure if i used a flash but i believe the glare/brightness from outside is affecting the histogram. I have now cropped most of the windows away and adjusted the histogram for best fit but still have spikes at either end. I have also attached my next attempt after editing. My question: is the picture salvageable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	BA VC-10 G-ARVM #4A 0705 EGLB.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1101411

    TIA
    Andrew
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for Too much or too little contrast. I used the same contrast levels as all other aircraft taken about the same time but it needs more contrast?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8527311

    TIA
    Andrew
    Contrast is a bit flat, yes. Also seems to be a light blue tint.

    Leave a comment:


  • AndrewL
    replied
    Hi All

    I had this picture rejected for Too much or too little contrast. I used the same contrast levels as all other aircraft taken about the same time but it needs more contrast?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8527311

    TIA
    Andrew

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X