Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quoc Trung Tran - Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Slight cyan cast, but otherwise no major issues.
    Thank you Dana. Have a good day!

    160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
    HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
    B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

    Comment


    • #17
      Dear Dana,

      Since neither I could figure out the type of this aircraft myself (I'm sorry for my lack of knowledge), nor the Jetphotos system has any information (I searched VN-B789 and got no result), can you please clarify the type of aircraft for me? So, the photo is counted as hot, right?

      And by the way, I would like to ask for your opinion on the quality of the photo, too.

      Thank you for your help.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	VNB789.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	524.8 KB
ID:	1032540

      160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
      HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
      B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
        Dear Dana,

        Since neither I could figure out the type of this aircraft myself (I'm sorry for my lack of knowledge), nor the Jetphotos system has any information (I searched VN-B789 and got no result), can you please clarify the type of aircraft for me? So, the photo is counted as hot, right?

        And by the way, I would like to ask for your opinion on the quality of the photo, too.

        Thank you for your help.

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]21312[/ATTACH]
        Dear Dana,

        Could you spend some time looking at this? Thank you very much.

        160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
        HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
        B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
          Dear Dana,

          Could you spend some time looking at this? Thank you very much.
          Appears to be a Beech King Air 350, but I can't find anything quickly online either. Image is soft and slightly overexposed.

          Comment


          • #20
            Thank you Dana. I've adjusted accordingly and here comes another version. Is it better now?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	789 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	519.4 KB
ID:	1032557

            160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
            HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
            B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
              Thank you Dana. I've adjusted accordingly and here comes another version. Is it better now?

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]21332[/ATTACH]
              Image is soft.

              Comment


              • #22
                Dear our beloved screeners,

                One of my photos has just been rejected for Bad color/Hue.

                Link to the photo I would like to ask for your opinion: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7083551

                Could you please tell me where I went wrong? From Dana's suggestion I know there's some slight cyan cast but do not think it would heavily affect the color pattern of the photo.

                Thank you very much and Happy Lunar New Year!

                160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
                HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
                B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

                Comment


                • #23
                  Hi,
                  Picture seems to be with RGB colour profile while we request sRGB

                  Happy Lunar New Year!

                  Regards
                  Alex

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                    Hi,
                    Picture seems to be with RGB colour profile while we request sRGB

                    Happy Lunar New Year!

                    Regards
                    Alex
                    Thanks Alex, I didn't notice that.

                    Cheers,
                    Trung

                    160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
                    HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
                    B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Dear our screeners,

                      Could I ask for your opinion on this one, especially regarding the leveling of the photo and its contrast?

                      Thank you very much.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0743 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,012.5 KB
ID:	1032790

                      160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
                      HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
                      B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
                        Dear our screeners,

                        Could I ask for your opinion on this one, especially regarding the leveling of the photo and its contrast?

                        Thank you very much.

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]21636[/ATTACH]
                        Looks OK, maybe a bit too high in the frame.
                        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Thanks Geri.

                          And could you please pre-screen the following photo for me? Feedback from everyone is invaluable to me, I've learnt a lot from you guys. Thank you so much.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	9MAGO 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	800.0 KB
ID:	1032818

                          160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
                          HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
                          B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
                            Thanks Geri.

                            And could you please pre-screen the following photo for me? Feedback from everyone is invaluable to me, I've learnt a lot from you guys. Thank you so much.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]21667[/ATTACH]
                            Needs good CW rotation and bit more contrast

                            Regards
                            Alex

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Thank you Alex for your advice!

                              Now recently some of my photos have been rejected, which I understand most apart from the following.

                              1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7116882
                              This is for Bad postprocessing with screener's comment: "Circular banding in sky"
                              Can you explain further about this and do you have any suggestion on how to fix it?

                              2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7116922
                              For Overexposed, I understand and it's gonna be an easy fix. However, for horizon unlevel, how do we determine the horizon of a photo with the aircraft in the air and without any specific background apart from cloud? Is that when aircraft is on its landing path the nose has to be up all the time? In this case, what if the nose is ditching down?

                              And one small request. The following photo has been accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9229050 but I've now noticed the photo date is wrong. It should be Jan 04, 2019, the same as other photos taken in the same day (IDs 9217782, 9194878, 9217773, 9204652, 9204648 ). Could you please change the date in photo for me since I do not find the date correction in the Info correction tool? Somehow I mistyped the date when uploaded it to the queue and never recognized the mistake. I'm sorry for this inconvenience.

                              Thank you very much for your time.

                              160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
                              HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
                              B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
                                Thank you Alex for your advice!

                                Now recently some of my photos have been rejected, which I understand most apart from the following.

                                1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7116882
                                This is for Bad postprocessing with screener's comment: "Circular banding in sky"
                                Can you explain further about this and do you have any suggestion on how to fix it?

                                2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7116922
                                For Overexposed, I understand and it's gonna be an easy fix. However, for horizon unlevel, how do we determine the horizon of a photo with the aircraft in the air and without any specific background apart from cloud? Is that when aircraft is on its landing path the nose has to be up all the time? In this case, what if the nose is ditching down?

                                And one small request. The following photo has been accepted https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9229050 but I've now noticed the photo date is wrong. It should be Jan 04, 2019, the same as other photos taken in the same day (IDs 9217782, 9194878, 9217773, 9204652, 9204648 ). Could you please change the date in photo for me since I do not find the date correction in the Info correction tool? Somehow I mistyped the date when uploaded it to the queue and never recognized the mistake. I'm sorry for this inconvenience.

                                Thank you very much for your time.
                                1. there is a dark circle in the center of the frame. The corners are much brighter. This could be due to poor vignetting removal
                                2. very unusual to see a 777 with that nose-down angle on approach, so very likely the horizon is off balance, even if we can't actually see it. Fix it by making the angle of the aircraft look more realistic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X