Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quoc Trung Tran - Pre-screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    Dear our screeners,

    Could I ask for your opinion on this one, especially regarding the leveling of the photo and its contrast?

    Thank you very much.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21636[/ATTACH]
    Looks OK, maybe a bit too high in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Dear our screeners,

    Could I ask for your opinion on this one, especially regarding the leveling of the photo and its contrast?

    Thank you very much.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0743 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,012.5 KB
ID:	1032790

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    Hi,
    Picture seems to be with RGB colour profile while we request sRGB

    Happy Lunar New Year!

    Regards
    Alex
    Thanks Alex, I didn't notice that.

    Cheers,
    Trung

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Hi,
    Picture seems to be with RGB colour profile while we request sRGB

    Happy Lunar New Year!

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Dear our beloved screeners,

    One of my photos has just been rejected for Bad color/Hue.

    Link to the photo I would like to ask for your opinion: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7083551

    Could you please tell me where I went wrong? From Dana's suggestion I know there's some slight cyan cast but do not think it would heavily affect the color pattern of the photo.

    Thank you very much and Happy Lunar New Year!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    Thank you Dana. I've adjusted accordingly and here comes another version. Is it better now?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21332[/ATTACH]
    Image is soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Thank you Dana. I've adjusted accordingly and here comes another version. Is it better now?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	789 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	519.4 KB
ID:	1032557

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    Dear Dana,

    Could you spend some time looking at this? Thank you very much.
    Appears to be a Beech King Air 350, but I can't find anything quickly online either. Image is soft and slightly overexposed.

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    Dear Dana,

    Since neither I could figure out the type of this aircraft myself (I'm sorry for my lack of knowledge), nor the Jetphotos system has any information (I searched VN-B789 and got no result), can you please clarify the type of aircraft for me? So, the photo is counted as hot, right?

    And by the way, I would like to ask for your opinion on the quality of the photo, too.

    Thank you for your help.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21312[/ATTACH]
    Dear Dana,

    Could you spend some time looking at this? Thank you very much.

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Dear Dana,

    Since neither I could figure out the type of this aircraft myself (I'm sorry for my lack of knowledge), nor the Jetphotos system has any information (I searched VN-B789 and got no result), can you please clarify the type of aircraft for me? So, the photo is counted as hot, right?

    And by the way, I would like to ask for your opinion on the quality of the photo, too.

    Thank you for your help.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	VNB789.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	524.8 KB
ID:	1032540

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Slight cyan cast, but otherwise no major issues.
    Thank you Dana. Have a good day!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    Good day everyone,

    Could you please tell me if there is any problem with these photos?

    Thank you for your patience, I really appreciate your help.

    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21304[/ATTACH]

    2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21305[/ATTACH]

    3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21306[/ATTACH]

    4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]21307[/ATTACH]
    Slight cyan cast, but otherwise no major issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Good day everyone,

    Could you please tell me if there is any problem with these photos?

    Thank you for your patience, I really appreciate your help.

    1. Click image for larger version

Name:	651 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	558.5 KB
ID:	1032532

    2. Click image for larger version

Name:	684 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	600.5 KB
ID:	1032533

    3. Click image for larger version

Name:	MLH 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	623.2 KB
ID:	1032534

    4. Click image for larger version

Name:	LNR 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	492.9 KB
ID:	1032535

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    I'm sorry, I'm wondering if the black spot in the bottom left corner of the photo is a dust spot? Thank you.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21063[/ATTACH]

    And by the way, can you please tell if there are any chances for the following photo to be accepted?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21064[/ATTACH]
    1. appears to be, yes
    2. borderline for contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    I'm sorry, I'm wondering if the black spot in the bottom left corner of the photo is a dust spot? Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2019-01-12 at 10.15.31 PM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	22.8 KB
ID:	1032323

    And by the way, can you please tell if there are any chances for the following photo to be accepted?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0882 1280.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	985.8 KB
ID:	1032324

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X