So I've recently received 2 rejected photos. They are rejected for too much or too little contrast as well as Undersharpened (soft). The soft reason i do understand... but for the contrast wise on my end, i feel is fine. but the reason of Too much or Too little contrast confuses me as I'm not sure if the screeners feel it's too much or too little, so I've linked the rejected photos below.

Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Editing advice - DillonLFC7
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DillonLFC7 View PostSo I've recently received 2 rejected photos. They are rejected for too much or too little contrast as well as Undersharpened (soft). The soft reason i do understand... but for the contrast wise on my end, i feel is fine. but the reason of Too much or Too little contrast confuses me as I'm not sure if the screeners feel it's too much or too little, so I've linked the rejected photos below.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18008[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18009[/ATTACH]
-
Not a screener but much like Pta Aviation says. Contrast definitely too low, look for online tutorials on how to fix that, should be easy.
Softness however can be seen in the Delta 747 for example on the numbers on the vertical stabiliser. Unfortunately any real hint of softness will always go down as soft. The American 777 should be ok for softness but I recommend smart sharpening on photoshop if that is what you are using for editting.
Good luck.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pta Aviation View PostTo me it looks like it's too little contrast. I would say increase the contrast. Most contrast rejections its usually too little contrast. However I do agree that the screeners should make it a little easier for us by specifying whether it's too much or too little when they issue contrast rejections.Originally posted by DeavesPhotography View PostNot a screener but much like Pta Aviation says. Contrast definitely too low, look for online tutorials on how to fix that, should be easy.
Softness however can be seen in the Delta 747 for example on the numbers on the vertical stabiliser. Unfortunately any real hint of softness will always go down as soft. The American 777 should be ok for softness but I recommend smart sharpening on photoshop if that is what you are using for editting.
Good luck.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DillonLFC7 View PostIs this better now?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18010[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18011[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by DillonLFC7 View PostHi,
I would like to have some advice on this photo and see if it has too much or too little contrast. This was just rejected for this reason. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23842[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by DillonLFC7 View PostHi,
I need some advice on this edit. Poor weather conditions resulted some poor lighting. I have been trying to fix the photos and was wondering if this was ok?
Comment
-
Originally posted by DillonLFC7 View PostHi I need some advice over these 2 photos. I keep getting "too much and too little contrast" rejection. Any ideas on how to fix it?
Comment
Comment