Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Peter Lund - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peter Lund - Editing Advice

    Hi guys,

    I just had a couple of photos rejected for various reasons.

    The following for being undersharpened and wrong categories. I honestly donīt remember what catagories that was tick if any since its 10days since I uploaded them. On both my screen they are well sharpened without being oversharpened or undersharp.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759290
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759289
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759288

    Thos one is just undersharp which I seem strange since itīs sharp on my screens.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759287

    I have lately had a lot rejected for undersharpened which I find strange since they are sharp on my end.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  • #2
    Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Hi guys,

    I just had a couple of photos rejected for various reasons.

    The following for being undersharpened and wrong categories. I honestly donīt remember what catagories that was tick if any since its 10days since I uploaded them. On both my screen they are well sharpened without being oversharpened or undersharp.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759290
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759289
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759288
    These are all blurry towards the nose
    Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Thos one is just undersharp which I seem strange since itīs sharp on my screens.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759287
    This one is borderline. Maybe it would be accepted on appeal.
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks GeDO,
      Iīll try appealling the last one.
      Best regards

      Peter Lund

      Comment


      • #4
        Dear Team,

        I recently got these rejected for vignetting, however others take at the same has been accepted or rejected without vignetting being the cause.
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054116
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054112
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054107
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054105

        I would also like some explanation on how to avoid "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)" since that is one of the other reason I often experience.
        Best regards

        Peter Lund

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
          Dear Team,

          I recently got these rejected for vignetting, however others take at the same has been accepted or rejected without vignetting being the cause.
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054116
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054112
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054107
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054105

          I would also like some explanation on how to avoid "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)" since that is one of the other reason I often experience.
          Vignetting due to corners being of a significantly different brightness than the rest of the frame. Bad color due to all of your images being submitted with Adobe RGB 1998 as the embedded color profile. Please use sRGB instead.

          Comment


          • #6
            Thank you for the reply.
            I am just surprised that some of the pictures had vignetting and others didnīt when they were taken in the same time periode on the same day and same equipment.

            Regarding sRGB this is something I think I found out how to do.
            Best regards

            Peter Lund

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
              Thank you for the reply.
              I am just surprised that some of the pictures had vignetting and others didnīt when they were taken in the same time periode on the same day and same equipment.
              Not too surprising actually, given that you seem to have been shooting with the aperture relatively wide open. Anything f/5.6 and below is more likely to show vignetting, especially when using a full-frame sensor. How much you've cropped the images will also play a factor in how much vignetting shows up. Heavy crops will obviously show less vignetting as you've effectively cut off the corners, while images with little cropping are much more likely to show it since more of the corners are there.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Not too surprising actually, given that you seem to have been shooting with the aperture relatively wide open. Anything f/5.6 and below is more likely to show vignetting, especially when using a full-frame sensor. How much you've cropped the images will also play a factor in how much vignetting shows up. Heavy crops will obviously show less vignetting as you've effectively cut off the corners, while images with little cropping are much more likely to show it since more of the corners are there.
                Thatīs true. Itīs been sometime since I edited those pictures so I canīt recall how much crop that was used in the other pictures.
                I try to shoot with f/5.6 or more.
                Best regards

                Peter Lund

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi all,
                  I finally managed to get some photos accepted again and a few rejected.

                  I got a question to this rejection (file error and bad info)
                  https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7289061

                  The file error I have never received before and would like soem clarification and is the bad info because itīs uploaded as Germanwings and not Eurowings ?

                  Also, thank you for correcting my Smartwings hybrid which I had ticked off as special colours.
                  Best regards

                  Peter Lund

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
                    The file error I have never received before and would like soem clarification
                    Only the top half of your image loads for me. The bottom half is just white. Not sure whether it's just me or the screeners experienced the same issue.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
                      Hi all,
                      I finally managed to get some photos accepted again and a few rejected.

                      I got a question to this rejection (file error and bad info)
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7289061

                      The file error I have never received before and would like soem clarification
                      File is corrupted. You will need to submit it again.

                      Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
                      and is the bad info because itīs uploaded as Germanwings and not Eurowings ?
                      This is not a military aircraft.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Thanks, I have tried uploading again.

                        I thought I had selected Civil genre, but apparently it didnīt register or I forgot.
                        Best regards

                        Peter Lund

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hi guys,

                          I am almost done editing the last pictures I have.

                          There are still a bunch which is as old as 4 years I still ahvenīt uploaded, but before I do so I would like to know if they are acceptable or if I need to start all over again.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	B-18708c031214.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	603.2 KB
ID:	1039688Click image for larger version

Name:	N619AEd031214.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	642.9 KB
ID:	1039689Click image for larger version

Name:	N951NNf031214.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	666.9 KB
ID:	1039690Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ABKJd260514.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	746.2 KB
ID:	1039691Click image for larger version

Name:	JA814Ae260514.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	726.8 KB
ID:	1039692
                          Best regards

                          Peter Lund

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Peter Lund View Post
                            Hi guys,

                            I am almost done editing the last pictures I have.

                            There are still a bunch which is as old as 4 years I still ahvenīt uploaded, but before I do so I would like to know if they are acceptable or if I need to start all over again.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]25033[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25034[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25035[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25036[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25037[/ATTACH]
                            All images will need to be uploaded with sRGB color profile, or a color rejection may result.

                            1. borderline contrast
                            2-3 soft/blurry
                            4. borderline contrast
                            5. borderline exposure/contrast

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hi Screeners,

                              I tried to upload a picture of 9HPGS which isnīt in the database and both attempts was rejected.

                              Will the picture below stand a chance which is a different angle than the 2 attempts ?
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	9H-PGSf100619.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1039974
                              Best regards

                              Peter Lund

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X