Originally posted by CrosswindPhoto
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pre-screen request | CrosswindPhoto
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by doublearon2003 View PostHello I am looking for some Pre-Screening help. Would this photo be acceptable in the database?
Have a question about Photo Editing software (Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro, etc.), improving your photos, etc.? Our crew of Photo Screeners is here to help you out!
Pay careful attention to #6. The image above is not uploadable, so pre-screening is not available.
Comment
-
Hi there,
For some reason I am once again not receiving screening results emails, it's very likely that outlook is blocking it for some reason. I emailed yesterday asking for my email to be changed as well as to get some clarification on the rejection of this photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10591039 but have gotten no reply.
It was rejected after appeal for motive, I stated in the upload comments that because it was a busy "open day" event that people in the background were unavoidable. Assuming the motive rejection is for people, what can I do to fix that? Blur faces? Nobody is looking at the camera so it should be ok right?
Tim
EDIT: This is my first JP forum post in a long time, the link in my signature are out of date, how do I change them? I can't find the setting.
Comment
-
Hi, taking a look at the screening history, the appeal screener wrote to you "If the faces were unavoidable this photo is one for your personal collection. It would also need the civil genre."
Looking at the photo there are clearly identifiable faces even if they are not looking directly at the camera. We simply don't have their permission to post their face online which can result in privacy issues. Some parents are very particular about having photos of their children posted online however innocent. We don't permit the blurring of faces and that would result in a manipulation rejection. If you have back of head shots which makes the person clearly un-identifiable then it might be ok.Last edited by B7772ADL; 2022-11-15, 12:58.
Comment
-
Hey Guys!
I'm pretty sure I have some long-lost prescreening thread that I haven't used in eons, but I have no idea if it even exists anymore so I apologize if this new thread causes issues.
Anyways, I have 2 questions for the staff.
1) I got a rejection today (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11548517) for motive that said "Airplane isn't Visible". I was just wondering if this is worth an appeal considering that, well, the plane is visible; it's just wrapped up for storage. But also considering the rarity of the photo and how the last photo in the db was from before this a/c's accident that left it hiding at a small airport in this state. I won't appeal if you don't think it's a good idea I just was wondering what a consensus was.
2) Not a prescreen per-se the CWHM in Hamilton has an Ex FedEx 727 in it's museum (nose only) that is painted to mimic an RCAF B707 but it's last civil registration is known (C-GBWA). I was wondering if it should be uploaded using FedEx/Morningstar as the airline, or the RCAF.
Thanks in advance!
Tim
Comment
-
Hi,
There's not a single part of the plane visible so yes it's a correct motive rejection and it would probably raise more than one eyebrow if we would accept such image.
For your question I believe the best solution would be to use the Fedex reg and mention its fake identity in the comment
Regards
Alex
Comment
Comment