Vicknesh PS - Editing Advice

[dlowwa]

Good morning. Was quite confident with this one, but alas....

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7700396

Worth an appeal?

Not imho, whole aircraft is soft.

[Vicknesh PS]

Understood, thanks.

[Vicknesh PS]

1. soft/blurry
2. contrast, heat haze
3. ok

Just a note, you're free to appeal any rejection you like, but multiple appeals without coming to the forum first and asking for advice first about the rejected images makes it much less likely that your future requests will be answered.

Hi there.
I submitted no.3 but it was rejected for "Dark/Underexposed"

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7706094

Should I appeal?

Regards

[dlowwa]

Hi there.
I submitted no.3 but it was rejected for "Dark/Underexposed"

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7706094

Should I appeal?

Regards

More a contrast issue than (under)exposure, but still not really worth an appeal.

[Vicknesh PS]

Good day.
I have this rejection "JPEG Compression Artefacts"

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7714625

Could you kindly help teach me where the artefacts are?

Thank you for your time.

[dlowwa]

Good day.
I have this rejection "JPEG Compression Artefacts"

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7714625

Could you kindly help teach me where the artefacts are?

Thank you for your time.

I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however

[Vicknesh PS]

I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however

Noted, quite understandable. My bad, my apologies. Anyhow, thanks for all the past help.

[Vicknesh PS]

I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however

Good evening.
I really do hope my apology has been accepted.
I've put myself in the dog house for 2.5 months as punishment so now I am hoping you will kindly continue to assist me.

Ok, here goes....

I have this rejection
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7896065
(JPG compression artefacts)

Is it worth an appeal?
Was hoping you could point out the JPG problem areas. I am still having problems noticing this issue.

Thank you for your time.
Best regards

[Vicknesh PS]

Good afternoon. It looks like I am still in the dog house.
Once again, Dana, I would like to convey my apologies ignoring advice.
Best regards.

[dlowwa]

Good afternoon. It looks like I am still in the dog house.
Once again, Dana, I would like to convey my apologies ignoring advice.
Best regards.

Not sure what you consider exactly as 'the dog house', but as noted above (and in this thread https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew ) if you plan on asking for advice we ask that you do it before appealing. There's no requirement that you do, but there is also no requirement that anyone reply to your request. That being said, your thread is still open to anyone else who would like to reply, including other screeners - the crew doesn't have a 'dog house' or 'blacklist' or anything of the sort

[Vicknesh PS]

Good morning.

I would like to inform of a mistake I made with this photo

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9623283

After going through my old high res photos I realized that this aircraft reg is TC-JNO and not TC-JND.
I mistook the "O" for a "D".
I leave it to your kind discretion as to whether you could kindly correct the mistake or reject/delete the photo.

My sincerest apologies.
Vicknesh PS