Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vicknesh PS - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however
    Noted, quite understandable. My bad, my apologies. Anyhow, thanks for all the past help.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Good day.
    I have this rejection "JPEG Compression Artefacts"

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7714625

    Could you kindly help teach me where the artefacts are?

    Thank you for your time.
    I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good day.
    I have this rejection "JPEG Compression Artefacts"

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7714625

    Could you kindly help teach me where the artefacts are?

    Thank you for your time.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post


    Hi there.
    I submitted no.3 but it was rejected for "Dark/Underexposed"

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7706094

    Should I appeal?

    Regards
    More a contrast issue than (under)exposure, but still not really worth an appeal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft/blurry
    2. contrast, heat haze
    3. ok

    Just a note, you're free to appeal any rejection you like, but multiple appeals without coming to the forum first and asking for advice first about the rejected images makes it much less likely that your future requests will be answered.

    Hi there.
    I submitted no.3 but it was rejected for "Dark/Underexposed"

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7706094

    Should I appeal?

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Understood, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Good morning. Was quite confident with this one, but alas....

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7700396

    Worth an appeal?
    Not imho, whole aircraft is soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good morning. Was quite confident with this one, but alas....

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7700396

    Worth an appeal?

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Noted. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Good day.
    I had this recent rejection

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7686890

    Is it worth an appeal?

    Thank you.
    No. Quite soft in the tail area.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good day.
    I had this recent rejection

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7686890

    Is it worth an appeal?

    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Thank you, am still learning.
    Its a good thing I did not submit the above 3 photos.

    Duly noted on the appeal. Will check here first.

    Thank you and best regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Hi.
    I think I messed up the attachments in my earlier post, sincerest apologies.
    Could please help me with these photos.
    Trying my hand at editing poor lighting photos.

    1. Low light concern
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29715[/ATTACH]

    2. Lower Resolution Attempt 1024px (sharpness concern)
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29716[/ATTACH]

    3. Cloudy/Overcast but the sun was shining like a spotlight on the aircraft through gaps in the clouds. Concerned about overexposed & contrast.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29717[/ATTACH]

    Your kind advise is always appreciated.
    Thank you for your time.
    1. soft/blurry
    2. contrast, heat haze
    3. ok

    Just a note, you're free to appeal any rejection you like, but multiple appeals without coming to the forum first and asking for advice first about the rejected images makes it much less likely that your future requests will be answered.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Hi.
    I think I messed up the attachments in my earlier post, sincerest apologies.
    Could please help me with these photos.
    Trying my hand at editing poor lighting photos.

    1. Low light concern
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0202_JA743A_070919_J.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	991.6 KB
ID:	1043669

    2. Lower Resolution Attempt 1024px (sharpness concern)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0399_EIDBK_050919_JS.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	661.2 KB
ID:	1043670

    3. Cloudy/Overcast but the sun was shining like a spotlight on the aircraft through gaps in the clouds. Concerned about overexposed & contrast.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0337_N344KD_050919_J.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	870.4 KB
ID:	1043671

    Your kind advise is always appreciated.
    Thank you for your time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Hi.
    Could please help me with these photos.
    Trying my hand at editing poor lighting photos.

    1. Low light concern.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0202_JA743A_070919_J.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	991.6 KB
ID:	1043621

    2. Lower resolution test 1024px
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0399_EIDBK_050919_JS.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	661.2 KB
ID:	1043622

    3. Cloudy/Overcast but sun was shining like a spotlight through gaps in the clouds
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0337_N344KD_050919_J (1).jpg
Views:	3
Size:	870.4 KB
ID:	1043620

    Any advise will be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you for your time.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X