Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vicknesh PS - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Oh, what a relief.
    I am ever so grateful.
    The word "banned" is extremely scary.

    Thank you very much dlowwa for your kind and prompt assistance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Hi.
    The original is a JPEG 6016x4016. It did not comply with the "upload attachments" size.

    I have place the original in "imgur", hope it works.

    Really appreciate the help.

    Best regards
    Vicknesh
    [/URL]
    Thanks. Image added, warning removed, and have let the two screeners involved know they were mistaken. Thanks for your patience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Hi.
    The original is a JPEG 6016x4016. It did not comply with the "upload attachments" size.

    I have place the original in "imgur", hope it works.


    http://

    Really appreciate the help.

    Best regards
    Vicknesh

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Good evening.
    I sadly received a reject for "Digital Manipulation".
    I am well aware of the seriousness of this rejection.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Aviation photos - 5 million+ on JetPhotos

    Can someone kindly advise me on where I went wrong?
    Which part of the photo is digitally manipulated?

    I did the standard
    rotate
    crop
    level / brightness curve
    denoise
    sharpening
    retouch 2 dust spots
    (they looked like birds - but I was recommended previously to remove them if they can be mistaken for dust spots)

    The software I am using is "Darktable"
    I did use "retouch" to remove 2 spots as shown in the picture below.

    This is the original picture for your reference

    Really do hope I can receive some guidance on this.

    Thank you for your time.

    Best regards
    Vicknesh
    If you can send me the actual original, I can look into rectifying the situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good evening.
    I sadly received a reject for "Digital Manipulation".
    I am well aware of the seriousness of this rejection.

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    Aviation photos - 5 million+ on JetPhotos

    Can someone kindly advise me on where I went wrong?
    Which part of the photo is digitally manipulated?

    I did the standard
    rotate
    crop
    level / brightness curve
    denoise
    sharpening
    retouch 2 dust spots
    (they looked like birds - but I was recommended previously to remove them if they can be mistaken for dust spots)

    The software I am using is "Darktable"
    I did use "retouch" to remove 2 spots as shown in the picture below.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Dust Removal.png
Views:	110
Size:	175.2 KB
ID:	1164421

    This is the original picture for your reference

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D75_0431_SUGDN.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	367.5 KB
ID:	1164422


    Really do hope I can receive some guidance on this.

    Thank you for your time.

    Best regards
    Vicknesh

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good morning.

    I would like to inform of a mistake I made with this photo

    TC-JND. Airbus A330-203. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    After going through my old high res photos I realized that this aircraft reg is TC-JNO and not TC-JND.
    I mistook the "O" for a "D".
    I leave it to your kind discretion as to whether you could kindly correct the mistake or reject/delete the photo.

    My sincerest apologies.
    Vicknesh PS

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Good afternoon. It looks like I am still in the dog house.
    Once again, Dana, I would like to convey my apologies ignoring advice.
    Best regards.
    Not sure what you consider exactly as 'the dog house', but as noted above (and in this thread https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew ) if you plan on asking for advice we ask that you do it before appealing. There's no requirement that you do, but there is also no requirement that anyone reply to your request. That being said, your thread is still open to anyone else who would like to reply, including other screeners - the crew doesn't have a 'dog house' or 'blacklist' or anything of the sort

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good afternoon. It looks like I am still in the dog house.
    Once again, Dana, I would like to convey my apologies ignoring advice.
    Best regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however
    Good evening.
    I really do hope my apology has been accepted.
    I've put myself in the dog house for 2.5 months as punishment so now I am hoping you will kindly continue to assist me.

    Ok, here goes....

    I have this rejection
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    (JPG compression artefacts)

    Is it worth an appeal?
    Was hoping you could point out the JPG problem areas. I am still having problems noticing this issue.

    Thank you for your time.
    Best regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however
    Noted, quite understandable. My bad, my apologies. Anyhow, thanks for all the past help.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post
    Good day.
    I have this rejection "JPEG Compression Artefacts"

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Could you kindly help teach me where the artefacts are?

    Thank you for your time.
    I won't be offering any more comments for your images given you've decided to ignore my previous advice. Anyone else is welcome to answer, however

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Good day.
    I have this rejection "JPEG Compression Artefacts"

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Could you kindly help teach me where the artefacts are?

    Thank you for your time.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Vicknesh PS View Post


    Hi there.
    I submitted no.3 but it was rejected for "Dark/Underexposed"

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Should I appeal?

    Regards
    More a contrast issue than (under)exposure, but still not really worth an appeal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft/blurry
    2. contrast, heat haze
    3. ok

    Just a note, you're free to appeal any rejection you like, but multiple appeals without coming to the forum first and asking for advice first about the rejected images makes it much less likely that your future requests will be answered.

    Hi there.
    I submitted no.3 but it was rejected for "Dark/Underexposed"

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Should I appeal?

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Vicknesh PS
    replied
    Understood, thanks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X