Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pre-screen/editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Click image for larger version

Name:	eov jp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	742.1 KB
ID:	1030726
    Does anyone know if it's acceptable? I'm pretty sure no, because of the bad light. it is acceptable?? regards

    Comment


    • #17
      Hello! I first apologize for being annoying, but I think there is a mistake, today I upload a HOT photo (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=70396970), and it was rejected by "INVALID HOT ", I justified HOT by saying that: / new colors, in the most recent photo of the DB the aircraft has the logo on the left door and it has no logo./ but it seems that the screener did not understand. I appealed and the reply was as follows: Your appeal for photo id 7039697 has been processed and has been rejected.
      Admin Comments >> no visible difference to the last uploads of this reg
      >> http://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7039697

      but the change is clear: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8667327 in this photo, including made from the same place, of course a logo on the left door (in my photo does not have)

      and that: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8667327 same thing.

      and in the other two photos the logo does not appear because only the right side of the airplane appears. (in which he never had the logo)

      I keep saying there's a change!

      Anyone can check it out for me?

      thanks in advance

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by enzocmte View Post
        Hello! I first apologize for being annoying, but I think there is a mistake, today I upload a HOT photo (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=70396970), and it was rejected by "INVALID HOT ", I justified HOT by saying that: / new colors, in the most recent photo of the DB the aircraft has the logo on the left door and it has no logo./ but it seems that the screener did not understand. I appealed and the reply was as follows: Your appeal for photo id 7039697 has been processed and has been rejected.
        Admin Comments >> no visible difference to the last uploads of this reg
        >> http://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7039697

        but the change is clear: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8667327 in this photo, including made from the same place, of course a logo on the left door (in my photo does not have)

        and that: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8667327 same thing.

        and in the other two photos the logo does not appear because only the right side of the airplane appears. (in which he never had the logo)

        I keep saying there's a change!

        Anyone can check it out for me?

        thanks in advance
        Sorry, but it's not obviously clear that the livery has been updated. The two most recent images lack the logo on the one side, so it would be logical to assume the other side is missing it as well. Someone looking at the two most recent images on FR24 would expect there to be no logo, and that is actually the case, so adding this as hot serves no real purpose, other than you not having to wait three days to have your image screened. Please put the image in the regular queue, and it will be screened in due time.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          Sorry, but it's not obviously clear that the livery has been updated. The two most recent images lack the logo on the one side, so it would be logical to assume the other side is missing it as well. Someone looking at the two most recent images on FR24 would expect there to be no logo, and that is actually the case, so adding this as hot serves no real purpose, other than you not having to wait three days to have your image screened. Please put the image in the regular queue, and it will be screened in due time.
          thanks

          rgds

          Comment


          • #20
            Click image for larger version

Name:	ASP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.63 MB
ID:	1032120 Click image for larger version

Name:	ARTISTICA3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	809.1 KB
ID:	1032121 Click image for larger version

Name:	LKS.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1032122 Click image for larger version

Name:	MPQ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.60 MB
ID:	1032123

            it's ok to upload?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by enzocmte View Post
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]20825[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]20826[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]20827[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]20828[/ATTACH]

              it's ok to upload?
              1. borderline oversharpened
              2. oversharpened/compression
              3. borderline motive (identifiable face)
              4. borderline overprocessed (halos on trees)

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                1. borderline oversharpened
                2. oversharpened/compression
                3. borderline motive (identifiable face)
                4. borderline overprocessed (halos on trees)
                thanks very much!

                Click image for larger version

Name:	vsf.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.80 MB
ID:	1032124

                and this? ok?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by enzocmte View Post
                  thanks very much!

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]20829[/ATTACH]

                  and this? ok?
                  Borderline for oversharpened & dark/contrast.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Borderline for oversharpened & dark/contrast.
                    Thanks so much

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	BXM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.84 MB
ID:	1032131 Click image for larger version

Name:	CAG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.62 MB
ID:	1032132 Click image for larger version

Name:	HNZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	921.6 KB
ID:	1032133 Click image for larger version

Name:	OSP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1032134

                      IT'S PASSABLE?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hi, please see #3:

                        https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          When you give the 24 hours do you pre-screen or do I have to post again?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by enzocmte View Post
                            When you give the 24 hours do you pre-screen or do I have to post again?
                            In the future, please try to observe the 24 hour limit before posting a new pre-screening request.

                            1. oversharpened, compression, borderline color. quality not really there for 1920pix
                            2. oversharpened
                            3. oversharpened, contrast, compression
                            4. borderline compression

                            All of the images would be better at a lower resolution like 1280pix.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                              In the future, please try to observe the 24 hour limit before posting a new pre-screening request.

                              1. oversharpened, compression, borderline color. quality not really there for 1920pix
                              2. oversharpened
                              3. oversharpened, contrast, compression
                              4. borderline compression

                              All of the images would be better at a lower resolution like 1280pix.
                              thanks so much

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	EOWJP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.60 MB
ID:	1032141

                              ok??

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by enzocmte View Post

                                ok??
                                Is that a question?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X