Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - Arnold Aaron

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ajaaron
    replied
    Can I just check the framing is good on this one. Also I don't see any halos. Please confirm. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2239-5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	416.3 KB
ID:	1032576

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    Thank you Dana.

    Is the crop acceptable on this BA A380?

    Notwithstanding that, I believe there are no other issues with it, ?? Thank you - really feel Im starting to get the hang of it...

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21314[/ATTACH]
    Feels a bit awkward to me. Editing halos also present.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Thank you Dana.

    Is the crop acceptable on this BA A380?

    Notwithstanding that, I believe there are no other issues with it, ?? Thank you - really feel Im starting to get the hang of it...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9056-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	379.4 KB
ID:	1032542

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    Just looking back at a rejection I had on this one - 'Too much or too little contrast'.... I can't make out if it needs more contrast or less. The histogram looks a little flat on the right hand side, am I right in saying therefore I need more contrast?
    Correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Just looking back at a rejection I had on this one - 'Too much or too little contrast'.... I can't make out if it needs more contrast or less. The histogram looks a little flat on the right hand side, am I right in saying therefore I need more contrast?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	22112_1546825923.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	481.8 KB
ID:	1032536
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Histogram.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	5.9 KB
ID:	1032537

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    Thank you so much for this - I now realise how subtle the halos are, but now I know what I'm looking for...

    Can I get your take on this one...is the colour and contrast correct?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21286[/ATTACH]
    Yes, looks fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Thank you so much for this - I now realise how subtle the halos are, but now I know what I'm looking for...

    Can I get your take on this one...is the colour and contrast correct?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6221-5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	517.2 KB
ID:	1032519

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    Can i ask, are you using a special function, e.g. equalize in photoshop (or any other function) to determine if a photo is over processed, or are you simply judging it with the naked eye? Reason I ask, is that for some reason I can't seem to recognize overprocessing just by looking at my photos...are halos the main culprit in overprocessing? -

    Would you or any other contributor be able to post a shot of my photos with the halos (or other overprocessing) circled in red so that I know what to look for, Obviously I am looking to be self sufficient at, it's just this last leg I need to be able to understand properly.

    Many thanks,
    Arnold.
    The sky immediately next to the aircraft is much darker than the rest of the sky. This is indicative of overprocessing. I've circled the most obvious areas in red. Note it's not the whole aircraft that has these halos, only certain areas.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5317.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	669.0 KB
ID:	1032506

    Equalizing the image will certainly make the halos more obvious, but I see 3,000+ images a week, so noticing them without the extra help isn't too difficult.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Can i ask, are you using a special function, e.g. equalize in photoshop (or any other function) to determine if a photo is over processed, or are you simply judging it with the naked eye? Reason I ask, is that for some reason I can't seem to recognize overprocessing just by looking at my photos...are halos the main culprit in overprocessing? -

    Would you or any other contributor be able to post a shot of my photos with the halos (or other overprocessing) circled in red so that I know what to look for, Obviously I am looking to be self sufficient at, it's just this last leg I need to be able to understand properly.

    Many thanks,
    Arnold.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    Can I check these photos are not overprocessed....

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21242[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21243[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21244[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21245[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21246[/ATTACH]
    Images would indeed be rejected for overprocessed (and dirty).

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Can I check these photos are not overprocessed....

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5256-2.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	321.4 KB
ID:	1032482

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5317.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	506.3 KB
ID:	1032483

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5342.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	384.6 KB
ID:	1032484

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5411.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	438.4 KB
ID:	1032485

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5459.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	446.1 KB
ID:	1032486

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    The 747-400...

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21175[/ATTACH]
    Overprocessed, borderline contrast.

    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    and finally this 777 - again tried to keep most settings near neutral, and with nice sunny conditions I hope I've got it right. Thanks for your patience.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21176[/ATTACH]
    Overprocessed, borderline cut off.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Good evening,
    Just wanting to check this Dash-8 747 & 777.

    Dash 8 - Contrast, highlights and shadow have been left near the 0 setting to avoid halos, and saturation of colours is also at almost the neutral setting. Conditions were ideal, so hope I've not missed anything.

    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/83267_1547679408.jpg

    The 747-400...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3332.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	471.2 KB
ID:	1032425

    and finally this 777 - again tried to keep most settings near neutral, and with nice sunny conditions I hope I've got it right. Thanks for your patience.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3029.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	423.6 KB
ID:	1032426
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
    Would be grateful for your take on this 757..

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21151[/ATTACH]
    Would be rejected for horizon, color, overprocessed, and dirty.

    Leave a comment:


  • ajaaron
    replied
    Would be grateful for your take on this 757..

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6468.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	642.9 KB
ID:	1032401

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X