Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - Arnold Aaron

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Good morning.

    Can I check this one is ok. Hopefully Im getting closer to mastering this...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2271-7.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	378.0 KB
ID:	1031655

    Thank you.

    Comment


    • #62
      Should be ok

      Comment


      • #63
        Can I run this past the forum...

        I've bumped up the contrast, and rotated slightly... Just want to check I've got this right. Thanks as always.

        Arnold.

        Please see the top photo... Ignore the pic below which says 'attached thumbnails'

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9750-7.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	460.5 KB
ID:	1031686
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
          Can I run this past the forum...

          I've bumped up the contrast, and rotated slightly... Just want to check I've got this right. Thanks as always.

          Arnold.

          Please see the top photo... Ignore the pic below which says 'attached thumbnails'

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]20282[/ATTACH]
          Horizon looks fine, but a bit low, and still almost certainly a contrast rejection.

          Comment


          • #65
            Made a tweak to the contrast - please confirm now ok. Your patience is appreciated!

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9750-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	457.8 KB
ID:	1031694

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
              Made a tweak to the contrast - please confirm now ok. Your patience is appreciated!

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]20295[/ATTACH]
              Marginally better, but I still wouldn't give it too much of a chance.

              Comment


              • #67
                Does it need even more contrast?

                Please advise. Thank you.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
                  Does it need even more contrast?

                  Please advise. Thank you.
                  It needs to have been taken in better light (ie not so strong overcast skies), which you can't fix with editing.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Good morning...

                    I've just had this photo rejected for being similar to a photo already in the database. However, the 2 photos show completely different views of the aircraft, yes they were taken in the same sequence, but one is a full shot of the a/c, while the other is a side profile showing the nose and underside of the wing/engine - a completely different presentation of the plane. Surely these are completely different photos, albeit of the same a/c, are they not? I could understand the rejection if both were full shots of the a/c, but surely both photos have merits on being in the database.

                    Is this a worthy of an appeal?

                    The rejected photo:
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	42931_1544180750.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	386.1 KB
ID:	1031765


                    Photo already in database:
                    https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/78200_1543277738.jpg

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
                      Is this a worthy of an appeal?
                      No, because

                      Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
                      yes they were taken in the same sequence,
                      https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version

                      2.6 Similar

                      "- a photo taken from the same sequence the same day is considered similar."

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Can I run these 2 past you please, - AA, and the Virgin A330. Hope I've got the crop, and sharpness/contrast correct on both of them. Many thanks.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3150-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	613.3 KB
ID:	1031835

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          and this Virgin A330...

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8527-7.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	346.5 KB
ID:	1031836

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
                            Can I run these 2 past you please, - AA, and the Virgin A330. Hope I've got the crop, and sharpness/contrast correct on both of them. Many thanks.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20472[/ATTACH]
                            Soft, noisy, cropping/ratio, overprocessed.

                            Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
                            and this Virgin A330...

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]20473[/ATTACH]
                            Dark, overprocessed.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Can I run this BA 747-400 past you...(the 2nd photo has a slightly higher level of brightness - not sure which is better?)

                              I've kept the highlights and contrast as close to zero as possible to avoid halos...

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2997.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	426.0 KB
ID:	1031869
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by ajaaron View Post
                                Can I run this BA 747-400 past you...(the 2nd photo has a slightly higher level of brightness - not sure which is better?)

                                I've kept the highlights and contrast as close to zero as possible to avoid halos...

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]20531[/ATTACH]
                                You've still got some localized halos that would cause an overprocessed rejection. However you've decided to mask/select/isolate the aircraft from the background, you've not done the best job of it, and there are halos in areas that would make them impossible to remove.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X