Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nicholas Hesler/NickFlightX - Editing Advise

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nickflightx View Post
    Looking to give this shot another go with this new edit. How does this edit look? Any improvements or suggestions?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23104[/ATTACH]
    Image is blurry and heavily compressed.

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    Looking to give this shot another go with this new edit. How does this edit look? Any improvements or suggestions?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0178.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	127.2 KB
ID:	1034032

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nickflightx View Post
    Hello,

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7210699

    Question about this rejection. I agree with the missing catagories, missed the Warbird check box by mistake. But Im confused about the invalid hot. I included the hot for the new decal added to the aircraft, not seen in any other photo. I have seen other photos accepted with a new or removed decal that are hot. Such as these:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088515
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088750

    Thanks in advanced!
    There is no other image of that side of the aircraft, so there is no need to accept it as hot since there is nothing to update. The two images you reference had previous versions that showed a clear difference to the updated image.

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    Hello,

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7210699

    Question about this rejection. I agree with the missing catagories, missed the Warbird check box by mistake. But Im confused about the invalid hot. I included the hot for the new decal added to the aircraft, not seen in any other photo. I have seen other photos accepted with a new or removed decal that are hot. Such as these:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088515
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088750

    Thanks in advanced!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nickflightx View Post
    Thanks guys for all the great feedback!

    How does this shot here look?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22804[/ATTACH]
    Hi, please read here, especially #2

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    Thanks guys for all the great feedback!

    How does this shot here look?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4776.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	1033775

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nickflightx View Post
    How does these photos look?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22605[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22606[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22607[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22608[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22609[/ATTACH]
    1-2 ok
    3 vignetting/obstruction (top right)
    4 ok
    5 borderline overexposed (buildings)

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    How does these photos look?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4548.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	854.0 KB
ID:	1033615
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4567.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	916.8 KB
ID:	1033616
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4632.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	848.3 KB
ID:	1033617
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4670.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	940.9 KB
ID:	1033618
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4738.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	755.5 KB
ID:	1033619

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by nickflightx View Post
    How do these photos look?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22271[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22272[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22273[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22274[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline dark
    2. borderline contrast
    3. contrast
    4. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4020.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1033322
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4445.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	527.4 KB
ID:	1033323
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4506.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.0 KB
ID:	1033324
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5108.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	593.1 KB
ID:	1033325

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    one for the personal collection definitely

    Regard
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    Thanks for offering to help.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1our...ew?usp=sharing

    I dont have a raw, mainly because it was taken on an iPhone (normally dont do this). Have gotten a few up in the past.

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by nickflightx View Post
    Had this photo rejected twice now for contrast. Can I get some opinion on what I should do to make this acceptable? First one was over contrast I could tell, but I have no idea for the second one. Can the rejection be changed to say which one it is, like a rejection for too much contrast and a rejection for to little contrast? This is by far the most common rejection I get and I am almost always confused as to which it is.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7151519
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152333
    Hi Nick,

    I didn't screen this pictures but unfortunately the high cloud layer leads to a trouble for contrast, while the plane looks good, the sky looks blown away, that's why you are getting the contrast rejection. It's leaning towards an overexposed rejection reason too. Do you have its raw file available? I can help you out if you have it

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    Had this photo rejected twice now for contrast. Can I get some opinion on what I should do to make this acceptable? First one was over contrast I could tell, but I have no idea for the second one. Can the rejection be changed to say which one it is, like a rejection for too much contrast and a rejection for to little contrast? This is by far the most common rejection I get and I am almost always confused as to which it is.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7151519
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152333

    Leave a comment:


  • nickflightx
    replied
    I am trying to upload the photo from the last post I made, but the airport is entered wrong into the database. Right now, it is entered into the database as "San Martin/South County - Q99" and has the country of "Wake Island". The upload page simply wont let me change the country to USA - California, it has already caused me a rejection. Further more, the airport now has the name/code of: "San Martin - E16". Any chance this can get fixed so I would be able to upload the photo?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X