Nicholas Hesler/NickFlightX - Editing Advise

[nickflightx]

Had this photo rejected twice now for contrast. Can I get some opinion on what I should do to make this acceptable? First one was over contrast I could tell, but I have no idea for the second one. Can the rejection be changed to say which one it is, like a rejection for too much contrast and a rejection for to little contrast? This is by far the most common rejection I get and I am almost always confused as to which it is.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7151519

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152333

[nickflightx]

I am trying to upload the photo from the last post I made, but the airport is entered wrong into the database. Right now, it is entered into the database as "San Martin/South County - Q99" and has the country of "Wake Island". The upload page simply wont let me change the country to USA - California, it has already caused me a rejection. Further more, the airport now has the name/code of: "San Martin - E16". Any chance this can get fixed so I would be able to upload the photo?

[dlowwa]

How does this photo look? Taken from an old camera, so not the best quality out there. Also, I am having trouble with uploading this pic. The airport, E16, does not appear to be in the data base. Cant find it anywhere.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21267[/ATTACH]

Some compression/oversharpening, but otherwise ok.

[nickflightx]

How does this photo look? Taken from an old camera, so not the best quality out there. Also, I am having trouble with uploading this pic. The airport, E16, does not appear to be in the data base. Cant find it anywhere.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

you could be right, not technically backlit by definition but like the senior replied to your appeal "fuselage is not well lit, correctly rejected" which I agree with. for such front lit shot of such a common aircraft I recommend you wait for a better chance

Regards
Alex

[nickflightx]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7034787

I got this rejected recently, and I am confused with the rejection. While the airplane is not very well lit, it is not back lit by definition. If you look at the taxiway center line, you can see that most of the shadow is on the far side of the center line, which shows that the plane is not back lit by definition. I appealed this a good time ago and haven't heard back which is why I am asking here.

Thanks

[dlowwa]

How does this photo look?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20880[/ATTACH]

Quality looks fine.

[nickflightx]

How does this photo look?

[pdeboer]

How do these photos look?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20570[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20571[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20572[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20573[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20574[/ATTACH]

1 looks acceptable, 2 and 3 are a bit dark, 4 and 5 look acceptable

[nickflightx]

How do these photos look?

[dlowwa]

Would this one get rejected for obstruction due to the loader on the back? (This is not edited for a jetphotos upload)

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20480[/ATTACH]

Most likely yes, since it is avoidable with better timing.

[nickflightx]

Would this one get rejected for obstruction due to the loader on the back? (This is not edited for a jetphotos upload)

[dlowwa]

How do these photos look?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20115[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20116[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20117[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20118[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20119[/ATTACH]

1-3 soft/blurry, overprocessed
4. ok
5. borderline soft

[nickflightx]

How do these photos look?

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]20045[/ATTACH]

How does this photo look? I am worried cause theres a big spike in the histogram for the bright side, but it clearly doesnt look over exposed. Thanks in advance!

Soft, and borderline for contrast.