Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre Screening Advice - Robbie Mathieson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Hi All, can I get some pre-screening on this one too please. I'm a bit worried about contrast, and also the fence. Thanks, Robbie
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
      Hi All, can I get some pre-screening on this one too please. I'm a bit worried about contrast, and also the fence. Thanks, Robbie
      This would be rejected for obstruction.

      Comment


      • #63
        No worries, Thanks Dana.

        Comment


        • #64
          Hi all, can I get some pre-screening on these 5 please. Lighting wasn't the best, thought I'd better ask for a second opinion before putting in the queue. Thanks, Robbie.
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
            Hi all, can I get some pre-screening on these 5 please. Lighting wasn't the best, thought I'd better ask for a second opinion before putting in the queue. Thanks, Robbie.
            Hi Robbie,
            Sorry but those have too poor light to be acceptable in terms of contrast, they look over edited too (too much noise reduction)

            Kind Regards
            Alex

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
              Hi Robbie,
              Sorry but those have too poor light to be acceptable in terms of contrast, they look over edited too (too much noise reduction)

              Kind Regards
              Alex
              Thought as much, thanks Alex

              Comment


              • #67
                Hi guys, can I get pre-screening on this one please. Thanks, RobbieClick image for larger version

Name:	31 - A6-EWJ.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	415.4 KB
ID:	1079680

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
                  Hi guys, can I get pre-screening on this one please. Thanks, RobbieClick image for larger version

Name:	31 - A6-EWJ.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	415.4 KB
ID:	1079680
                  Very borderline for contrast.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Very borderline for contrast.
                    Thanks Dana, I think it would be too much contrast in the above would that be correct?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Hi all, regarding https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7857381. Quite a few times this shot has been rejected for Bad Info and also Categories Wrong/Missing. Can you please advise what I'm doing wrong as I've been uploading it as Military, which I believe to be correct. I've just figured out that it also comes under business jet so will upload as that when I've re-edited.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
                        Hi all, regarding https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7857381. Quite a few times this shot has been rejected for Bad Info and also Categories Wrong/Missing. Can you please advise what I'm doing wrong as I've been uploading it as Military, which I believe to be correct. I've just figured out that it also comes under business jet so will upload as that when I've re-edited.
                        This is not a military aircraft.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                          This is not a military aircraft.
                          Well, that would explain it. Thanks Dana

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Hi guys, in my most recent batch I received a few rejections for similar - one example is https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7898241 compared to id 9612641 which was accepted. May I ask whether or not there has been a change in the upload guidelines? In the past, photos on aircraft on approach have never been considered as similar to those of an aircraft taking off, has this changed? As otherwise I fail to see how they can be considered similiar. See ID's 9519471 & 9115209 as an example. Many Thanks, Robbie

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
                              Hi guys, in my most recent batch I received a few rejections for similar - one example is https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7898241 compared to id 9612641 which was accepted. May I ask whether or not there has been a change in the upload guidelines? In the past, photos on aircraft on approach have never been considered as similar to those of an aircraft taking off, has this changed? As otherwise I fail to see how they can be considered similiar. See ID's 9519471 & 9115209 as an example. Many Thanks, Robbie
                              Last change to the guidelines regarding similars was a couple of years ago. Generally we allow one image per side/stage of flight (in the air on the ground) for a maximum of four - left side/right side in the air + left side/right side on the ground, but this is a general guideline and exceptions can be made if the images are quite different (obviously different sequences and dates). For your two examples, I'd say the accepted pair benefitted from a more lenient interpretation, while the rejected pair a little more strict, but subjective in both cases, obviously. In my personal opinion, the rejected pair despite being different sequences and are too similar (and the same date), and therefore the rejection was justified.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                                Last change to the guidelines regarding similars was a couple of years ago. Generally we allow one image per side/stage of flight (in the air on the ground) for a maximum of four - left side/right side in the air + left side/right side on the ground, but this is a general guideline and exceptions can be made if the images are quite different (obviously different sequences and dates). For your two examples, I'd say the accepted pair benefitted from a more lenient interpretation, while the rejected pair a little more strict, but subjective in both cases, obviously. In my personal opinion, the rejected pair despite being different sequences and are too similar (and the same date), and therefore the rejection was justified.
                                okay, thanks Dana

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X