Pre Screening Advice - Robbie Mathieson

[VH-ROB]

Hi All, a few questions in regards to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7161632.

It's just been rejected for manipulation, and the rejection email states that the bottom shows signs of cloning. I'm assuming that the screener means the part on the left hand side? This is actually part of the airport perimeter fence, and obviously, if I was to clone it out, it would then be rejected fro manipulation. What would you suggest that I do in this instance? Would the photo be best left for my personal collection?

Many Thanks, Robbie

[dlowwa]

Hi all, in reference to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7085691

how can I avoid getting compression rejections? There's nothing I've changed in my editing workflow that I feel would lead to a compression rejection. Only thing I can think of would be having uploaded at 1024 but I highly doubt that's the case. Many Thanks, Robbie

Blotchy sky, but that's more an effect of shooting through a window than bad editing. I would ignore that particular rejection reason unless you start getting more and more of the same type, in which case bring back those examples to the forum.

[VH-ROB]

Hi all, in reference to https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7085691

how can I avoid getting compression rejections? There's nothing I've changed in my editing workflow that I feel would lead to a compression rejection. Only thing I can think of would be having uploaded at 1024 but I highly doubt that's the case. Many Thanks, Robbie

[dlowwa]

Hi guys, can I please get some pre-screening on this one. I'm especially a bit unsure on whether or not it would be considered as similar to photo id 7775578.

Would be rejected for oversharpened, cut off, and yes, similar.

[VH-ROB]

Hi guys, can I please get some pre-screening on this one. I'm especially a bit unsure on whether or not it would be considered as similar to photo id 7775578.

[LX-A343]

Appealed, and accepted. Thanks Gerardo

You're welcome!

[VH-ROB]

I would appeal it. I can't see any dust spots.

Appealed, and accepted. Thanks Gerardo

[LX-A343]

Hi guys, I've just had the following rejected for dust spots, however when equalized I can't find any dust-spots. Can someone please point me in the right direction of how to remove them. Many Thanks, Robbie.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6983288

I would appeal it. I can't see any dust spots.

[VH-ROB]

Hi guys, I've just had the following rejected for dust spots, however when equalized I can't find any dust-spots. Can someone please point me in the right direction of how to remove them. Many Thanks, Robbie.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6983288

[dlowwa]

The dlowwa, by harsh contrast do you mean too much yes?

Correct.

[VH-ROB]

Soft (low DOF), and borderline (harsh) contrast.

The dlowwa, by harsh contrast do you mean too much yes?

[dlowwa]

Hi all, after the discussion yesterday regarding flightdeck photography on anothe post, I've tried an edit on this one. Just seeking a second opinion before I upload it. Many Thanks, Robbie [ATTACH=CONFIG]20003[/ATTACH]

Soft (low DOF), and borderline (harsh) contrast.

[VH-ROB]

Hi all, after the discussion yesterday regarding flightdeck photography on anothe post, I've tried an edit on this one. Just seeking a second opinion before I upload it. Many Thanks, Robbie

[VH-ROB]

Light background and no light on a white plane, unfortunately there isn't much you can do in such conditions, definitely a contrast/dark rejection.

Regards
Alex

No worries, thanks Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Light background and no light on a white plane, unfortunately there isn't much you can do in such conditions, definitely a contrast/dark rejection.

Regards
Alex