If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thanks Dana, would this photo be more appropriate? Obviously rezised etc before uploading
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23517[/ATTACH]
Now it is blocking an engine, please refer to what Dana wrote :
Generally tugs only get away with blocking the nose gear (if they're actually in the process of towing). Anything more than that, and an obstruction rejection is likely, as was the case here.
Hi all, yesterday I had a whole batch rejected, mainly for Contrast & Colour. Can you please advise what the issue is, as to the naked eye they look okay to me. Have linked one of the photos below. Thanks, Robbie
Hi all, yesterday I had a whole batch rejected, mainly for Contrast & Colour. Can you please advise what the issue is, as to the naked eye they look okay to me. Have linked one of the photos below. Thanks, Robbie https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7292392
Oversaturated and very harsh contrast. Definitely deserving of a rejection. If that looks ok to you, you might want to check your monitor settings.
Hi guys, the following just got rejected for similar - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7330316. Having looked at my other photos of this rego in the database, the only photo that I feel would be similar is photo id 8794973, however if I remember correctly, the upload guidelines used to state that it was not considered similar if the airframe was wearing an updated livery, as is the case in this photo, however that part is no longer mentioned in the upload guidelines. Can you please confirm whether or not that is still the case or have the guidelines changed and I've not realised? Many Thanks, Robbie
Hi guys, the following just got rejected for similar - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7330316. Having looked at my other photos of this rego in the database, the only photo that I feel would be similar is photo id 8794973, however if I remember correctly, the upload guidelines used to state that it was not considered similar if the airframe was wearing an updated livery, as is the case in this photo, however that part is no longer mentioned in the upload guidelines. Can you please confirm whether or not that is still the case or have the guidelines changed and I've not realised? Many Thanks, Robbie
If there is a (permanent) difference in livery, then it shouldn't be considered similar. Might be a good idea to include a note to the screeners next time when uploading such images (ones that appear similar at first glance), clarifying how the livery has been updated.
If there is a (permanent) difference in livery, then it shouldn't be considered similar. Might be a good idea to include a note to the screeners next time when uploading such images (ones that appear similar at first glance), clarifying how the livery has been updated.
Thanks Dana, that's actually quite a good idea, I'll bear that in mind for future uploads. Regarding the one that was rejected, should I appeal it, or upload it into the queue again? Many Thanks, Robbie
Thanks Dana, that's actually quite a good idea, I'll bear that in mind for future uploads. Regarding the one that was rejected, should I appeal it, or upload it into the queue again? Many Thanks, Robbie
I would appeal it, explaining the difference in livery between the images.
Can I get some advice please on https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7353380. To me, the contrast looks fine, and looks very similar to photo id 9341828, which was taken by a friend who was only around 5 metres away from me. Thanks, Robbie
Can I get some advice please on https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7353380. To me, the contrast looks fine, and looks very similar to photo id 9341828, which was taken by a friend who was only around 5 metres away from me. Thanks, Robbie
I'd have considered your friend's image to be borderline to start with, and his is a much better edit, so there you go. Yours is also soft, besides the contrast issue, just to be aware.
I'd have considered your friend's image to be borderline to start with, and his is a much better edit, so there you go. Yours is also soft, besides the contrast issue, just to be aware.
Hi guys, can I get some feedback regarding this one please, I feel it may be rejected for quality but want a second opinion before I put it in the queue. Thanks, Robbie
Hi guys, can I get some feedback regarding this one please, I feel it may be rejected for quality but want a second opinion before I put it in the queue. Thanks, Robbie
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25542[/ATTACH]
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment