Hi all, got asimilar rejection that I'd like a second opinion on. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8074603 - obviously, the softness can be fixed, however I fail to see in which way it's similar. The only other Perth spotting location shot I have is 9677993, which is a totally different location situated inside rather than outside, and on the opposite side of the airfield. Many Thanks, Robbie
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pre Screening Advice - Robbie Mathieson
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi all, got asimilar rejection that I'd like a second opinion on. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8074603 - obviously, the softness can be fixed, however I fail to see in which way it's similar. The only other Perth spotting location shot I have is 9677993, which is a totally different location situated inside rather than outside, and on the opposite side of the airfield. Many Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Hi All, I've been having a bit of trouble with contrast in the following 2 images, and also with exposure in the flight deck shot.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Are either of these shots fixable or should I keep them for my own collection? Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi All, I've been having a bit of trouble with contrast in the following 2 images, and also with exposure in the flight deck shot.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Are either of these shots fixable or should I keep them for my own collection? Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Terrible light on the first one, definitely not fixable. Second the exterior is blown out; if you've got enough dynamic range on the RAW file, you might be able to recover it, but in my experience that can often lead to it looking unnatural. For future reference, it's usually easier to recover shadows than highlights, so next opportunity you get on the flight deck, try to expose more for the exterior, and recover the interior later, as the opposite can prove to be quite tricky, if not impossible.
Comment
-
Hi All, can I get some advice on the following please - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199039. Having used the 'centre' tool on the rejection page, it looks absolutely fine to myself, can you please advise on how to fix it. Thanks, Robbie
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View PostHi All, can I get some advice on the following please - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199039. Having used the 'centre' tool on the rejection page, it looks absolutely fine to myself, can you please advise on how to fix it. Thanks, Robbie
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
No, this is much too dark. Looks like the light was very harsh that day, which is not helped with an all-white aircraft. You will need to balance the image so that it is overall well exposed without blowing out the highlights on the fuselage.
Comment
Comment