Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre Screening Advice - Robbie Mathieson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Check with the centering tool again. More space above it than below.
    Okay, thanks Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
    Hi All, can I get some advice on the following please - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199039. Having used the 'centre' tool on the rejection page, it looks absolutely fine to myself, can you please advise on how to fix it. Thanks, Robbie
    Check with the centering tool again. More space above it than below.

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Hi All, can I get some advice on the following please - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8199039. Having used the 'centre' tool on the rejection page, it looks absolutely fine to myself, can you please advise on how to fix it. Thanks, Robbie

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Too low in the frame, and contrast a bit harsh.
    Thought so about the contrast, thanks Dana.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
    Hi all, can I please get some pre-screening advice on the attached. Thanks, Robbie
    Too low in the frame, and contrast a bit harsh.

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Hi all, can I please get some pre-screening advice on the attached. Thanks, Robbie
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Terrible light on the first one, definitely not fixable. Second the exterior is blown out; if you've got enough dynamic range on the RAW file, you might be able to recover it, but in my experience that can often lead to it looking unnatural. For future reference, it's usually easier to recover shadows than highlights, so next opportunity you get on the flight deck, try to expose more for the exterior, and recover the interior later, as the opposite can prove to be quite tricky, if not impossible.
    Okay, thanks Dana. Will bear the flightdeck tip in mind for the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
    Hi All, I've been having a bit of trouble with contrast in the following 2 images, and also with exposure in the flight deck shot.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8134883
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8134887
    Are either of these shots fixable or should I keep them for my own collection? Thanks, Robbie
    Terrible light on the first one, definitely not fixable. Second the exterior is blown out; if you've got enough dynamic range on the RAW file, you might be able to recover it, but in my experience that can often lead to it looking unnatural. For future reference, it's usually easier to recover shadows than highlights, so next opportunity you get on the flight deck, try to expose more for the exterior, and recover the interior later, as the opposite can prove to be quite tricky, if not impossible.

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Hi All, I've been having a bit of trouble with contrast in the following 2 images, and also with exposure in the flight deck shot.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8134883
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8134887
    Are either of these shots fixable or should I keep them for my own collection? Thanks, Robbie

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    If it's clear in the comments/description that it's a completely different location, should be ok to try again if the quality is improved.
    Awesome, thanks Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
    Hi all, got asimilar rejection that I'd like a second opinion on. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8074603 - obviously, the softness can be fixed, however I fail to see in which way it's similar. The only other Perth spotting location shot I have is 9677993, which is a totally different location situated inside rather than outside, and on the opposite side of the airfield. Many Thanks, Robbie
    If it's clear in the comments/description that it's a completely different location, should be ok to try again if the quality is improved.

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Hi all, got asimilar rejection that I'd like a second opinion on. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8074603 - obviously, the softness can be fixed, however I fail to see in which way it's similar. The only other Perth spotting location shot I have is 9677993, which is a totally different location situated inside rather than outside, and on the opposite side of the airfield. Many Thanks, Robbie

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Glare/reflection on both edges of the frame. Not fixable.
    That's what I was worried about. Thanks Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by VH-ROB View Post
    Hi all, regarding https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8004449. Obviously, soft can be fixed. However, window glare/dirt I'm not so sure about. Is there any way of this shot being edited enough that it would be acceptable for the database.
    Glare/reflection on both edges of the frame. Not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • VH-ROB
    replied
    Hi all, regarding https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8004449. Obviously, soft can be fixed. However, window glare/dirt I'm not so sure about. Is there any way of this shot being edited enough that it would be acceptable for the database.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X