Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

klaxspotting Editing Advice Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • klaxspotting
    replied
    These too please? Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N829NW JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	633.5 KB
ID:	1032631Click image for larger version

Name:	G-CIVI JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1032632Click image for larger version

Name:	N927VA JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	674.9 KB
ID:	1032633Click image for larger version

Name:	ZK-OKI JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	610.2 KB
ID:	1032634Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-LRA JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	499.5 KB
ID:	1032635

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klaxspotting View Post
    Here's 5 more just for thoroughness:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21318[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21321[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21322[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21323[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21324[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline soft/blurry
    2. soft
    3. ok
    4. borderline horizon (ccw)
    5. blurry

    Leave a comment:


  • klaxspotting
    replied
    Here's 5 more just for thoroughness:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N16525 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	836.4 KB
ID:	1032544Click image for larger version

Name:	N512AS JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	743.1 KB
ID:	1032547Click image for larger version

Name:	N136SY JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	890.0 KB
ID:	1032548Click image for larger version

Name:	N862UP JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	843.9 KB
ID:	1032549Click image for larger version

Name:	N710SY JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	363.4 KB
ID:	1032550

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klaxspotting View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21281[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21282[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21283[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21284[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21285[/ATTACH]
    Could I get some advice on these 5? Mostly concerned with contrast and exposure issues on Contour and Alaska because of the cloud cover. Thanks!
    1. borderline soft/obstruction
    2. contrast
    3. top of sky blown out. maybe try 16:9 crop to lessen that area
    4. borderline contrast
    5. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • klaxspotting
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N820UP JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	949.1 KB
ID:	1032514Click image for larger version

Name:	N596AS JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	657.1 KB
ID:	1032515Click image for larger version

Name:	N238MH JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	471.6 KB
ID:	1032516Click image for larger version

Name:	N15527 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	370.6 KB
ID:	1032517Click image for larger version

Name:	N241LR JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	929.7 KB
ID:	1032518
    Could I get some advice on these 5? Mostly concerned with contrast and exposure issues on Contour and Alaska because of the cloud cover. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klaxspotting View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20883[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20884[/ATTACH]
    Can I get some advice on these two? I can't figure out which to upload, so I figured I would ask and see which one has the least flaws and go with that haha. Most of my concerns are with horizon, contrast, and possibly glare. Thanks!
    Don't see a big difference in quality between the two.

    Leave a comment:


  • klaxspotting
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N895DN JP 1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	421.7 KB
ID:	1032176Click image for larger version

Name:	N895DN JP 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	709.9 KB
ID:	1032177
    Can I get some advice on these two? I can't figure out which to upload, so I figured I would ask and see which one has the least flaws and go with that haha. Most of my concerns are with horizon, contrast, and possibly glare. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klaxspotting View Post
    Hey guys! Just making this thread for any editing advice questions!

    I'm going to start it off with one I'm not too sure about. I tried my hand at night spotting last night and only got one semi-decent result. I was just wondering if the sharpness, exposure, and anything else were at least up to par, although I don't think they are:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19857[/ATTACH]

    Thanks for your help with this and future photos!
    -Cameron Stone
    Image is blurry, so unfortunately not much point in worrying about anything beyond that.

    Leave a comment:


  • klaxspotting
    replied
    klaxspotting Editing Advice Thread

    Hey guys! Just making this thread for any editing advice questions!

    I'm going to start it off with one I'm not too sure about. I tried my hand at night spotting last night and only got one semi-decent result. I was just wondering if the sharpness, exposure, and anything else were at least up to par, although I don't think they are:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N932LR JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	361.8 KB
ID:	1031364

    Thanks for your help with this and future photos!
    -Cameron Stone

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klaxspotting View Post
    So not long ago, I got this photo (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6699554) rejected for "too much or too little contrast" I appealed it, since I wasn't too sure about it, and the response I got was a rejection with the note "Almost backlit" and nothing else (screenshot of email is attached). I'm a little confused, as a photo being almost backlit shouldn't be a reason to be rejected, and there was no comment about the supposed contrast issue with the photo. Could someone please explain why the appeal was responded to like it was, and (if improving the photo is possible) how to improve it to make it acceptable? Thank you in advance!
    Light is really harsh there. You could try editing it to lift the shadows a bit, but I'm not sure it would be worth the effort, or even possible to yield an acceptable result.

    Leave a comment:


  • klaxspotting
    started a topic klaxspotting Editing Advice Thread

    klaxspotting Editing Advice Thread

    So not long ago, I got this photo (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6699554) rejected for "too much or too little contrast" I appealed it, since I wasn't too sure about it, and the response I got was a rejection with the note "Almost backlit" and nothing else (screenshot of email is attached). I'm a little confused, as a photo being almost backlit shouldn't be a reason to be rejected, and there was no comment about the supposed contrast issue with the photo. Could someone please explain why the appeal was responded to like it was, and (if improving the photo is possible) how to improve it to make it acceptable? Thank you in advance!
    Attached Files
Working...
X