Image is way too soft sorry
Regards
Alex
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vincenzo Caccamo - editing/pre-screening
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Vincenzo Caccamo View PostHere is the original photo. more than this I can not do.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]20988[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vincenzo Caccamo View PostI intended to say that the original photo I have loaded her on Jetphotos (the second that I have written on this forum) but you/he/she has been me rejected. Then I have modified her and reloaded on the site (the first photo that I have written on this forum) but you/he/she has been me rejected also it. That's why I have turned to the forum to look for help. And I repeat without you become rabid me that the original photo is the second writing on the forum. It will seem her strange I know him/it but it is this way
The point is that it would be best if you posted the original/raw image that you took, before you edited it, and before you uploaded it. That way we can see if the quality is good enough to put any more effort into it.
Leave a comment:
-
Then if you want I can reload her/it but with more elevated dimensions.
Leave a comment:
-
I intended to say that the original photo I have loaded her on Jetphotos (the second that I have written on this forum) but you/he/she has been me rejected. Then I have modified her and reloaded on the site (the first photo that I have written on this forum) but you/he/she has been me rejected also it. That's why I have turned to the forum to look for help. And I repeat without you become rabid me that the original photo is the second writing on the forum. It will seem her strange I know him/it but it is this way
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vincenzo Caccamo View PostIf do a more appropriate analysis among the two photos realize you that there are some differences!!! And then the links are different. The photo orginale doesn't introduce the sfocatures and introduces some nuisance.
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostThe original photo would be the one your camera produced before you did any editing.
Leave a comment:
-
If do a more appropriate analysis among the two photos realize you that there are some differences!!! And then the links are different. The photo orginale doesn't introduce the sfocatures and introduces some nuisance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vincenzo Caccamo View PostWhat is Helo???
Originally posted by Vincenzo Caccamo View PostThese is the original photo:
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7048803
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Vincenzo Caccamo View PostHi,
I have these 1 pictures rejected for Undersharpened (Soft) JPG compression artefacts.
Let it be that the helicopter is not centered because it is a refusal that I can correct. Instead I have big problems with the compression of the image. I tried to avoid it with photoshop but I save it compressed, how do I do ??? In addition I made it clearer but I was rejected. Why???
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7049026
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi,
I have these 1 pictures rejected for Undersharpened (Soft) JPG compression artefacts.
Let it be that the helicopter is not centered because it is a refusal that I can correct. Instead I have big problems with the compression of the image. I tried to avoid it with photoshop but I save it compressed, how do I do ??? In addition I made it clearer but I was rejected. Why???
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7049026
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: