chrislait - editing advice please

[Chrislait]

Thanks T .. You are right, thats a huge difference. How did you "equalise" the photo? Is this a lightroom tool?

Thanks again

[777MAN]

I have significantly reduced the highlight / shadow editing on this version. Hope it has helped??

https://i.ibb.co/QMP65DW/Qantas-737-800-VH-VYJ-Cann-River-171118-V3-JP.jpg

Thanks
Chris

Hi Chris,

Thats much better. I have done a before and after (equalised) to show you the difference. As I said, leave those sliders alone mate and you are good to go from here on. (hopefully )
Regards T

[Chrislait]

I have significantly reduced the highlight / shadow editing on this version. Hope it has helped??

https://i.ibb.co/QMP65DW/Qantas-737-800-VH-VYJ-Cann-River-171118-V3-JP.jpg

Thanks
Chris

[Chrislait]

Thanks T. You are correct, I have been using Lightroom and do use the shadow / highlight (a bit) and clarity (not much) sliders. I'll re-edit these out and see if that will fix it. I'll repost new new image when its done

Thanks
Chris

[777MAN]

Thanks ..

Does this version of the Qantas 737 look more suitable? https://i.ibb.co/bbKZdBq/Qantas-737-...-171118-V2.jpg

Thanks
Chris

Hi Chris,

Still has visible editting halos.

I have had a quick look at the exif, all looks ok there. It shows you used Lightroom? If yes, have you used the shadow/highlight and or clarity sliders? That could be a cause of halos. I use Lightroom in my workflow and have those set to 0. I only adjust exposure (as needed) and the white/black sliders using the mask (option (mac) /alt (windows)) to fine tune exposure; lens correction & CA ticked and thats it off to photoshop, no halos.

Hope that helps, if not happy to help

regards
T

[Chrislait]

Thanks ..

Does this version of the Qantas 737 look more suitable? https://i.ibb.co/bbKZdBq/Qantas-737-...-171118-V2.jpg

Thanks
Chris

[dlowwa]

Hi .. just seeking some thoughts on these 2 rejected photos ..

Virgin Australia - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6955006 - Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

Qantas - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6955002 - Over Processed / Bad postprocessing, and Undersharpened (Soft)

What do you see is the best way to re-edit these to make them acceptable?

Thanks
Chris

There are editing halos visible on both. If you can find a way to re-process them without the halos (plus sharpening for the second), they should be acceptable.

[Chrislait]

Hi .. just seeking some thoughts on these 2 rejected photos ..

Virgin Australia - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6955006 - Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

Qantas - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6955002 - Over Processed / Bad postprocessing, and Undersharpened (Soft)

What do you see is the best way to re-edit these to make them acceptable?

Thanks
Chris

[dlowwa]

In relation to the Cebu Pacific above - do you feel this is any better? I have re-edited to try and bring up the contrast on the plane

https://i.ibb.co/wNnywbv/Cebu-Pacific-RP-C3348.jpg

Thanks
Chris

Still borderline contrast imho, and looking a little overprocessed now.

[Chrislait]

In relation to the Cebu Pacific above - do you feel this is any better? I have re-edited to try and bring up the contrast on the plane

https://i.ibb.co/wNnywbv/Cebu-Pacific-RP-C3348.jpg

Thanks
Chris

[Chrislait]

Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hi .. Just after sone guidance on these 2 as well before they drop off my rejected list ..

Jetstar - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6935589 - This one was rejected for "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing"

Private - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6935574 - This one was rejected for Dark / Underexposed & Bad Info. The "dark" I can fix .. not sure what the Bad Info was as I thought I used the auto infor from the database on submission. Perhaps a screener could assist with this one so I can correct the mistake if I re-upload.

Thanks for your help
Chris

1. editing halos visible.
2. cn missing

[Chrislait]

Hi .. Just after sone guidance on these 2 as well before they drop off my rejected list ..

Jetstar - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6935589 - This one was rejected for "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing"

Private - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6935574 - This one was rejected for Dark / Underexposed & Bad Info. The "dark" I can fix .. not sure what the Bad Info was as I thought I used the auto infor from the database on submission. Perhaps a screener could assist with this one so I can correct the mistake if I re-upload.

Thanks for your help
Chris

[Chrislait]

Great. Thanks for your help.

[dlowwa]

Sorry about the ANZ link - this is the right one now https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6944596

Thanks for the feedback on the other 2 .. I will see if I can re-edit to make them better.

Chris

Not too bad, but as with the others, a bit dull. May be fixable.