Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

natalie huang - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hi, it's me again -
    The photo below was rejected for being underexposed and for contrast reasons:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7078442
    Could someone please clarify some features of the photo that matched these criteria for rejection? I'm not too sure where the problem would be
    Thank you so much in advance!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Natalie Huang View Post
      Hi, it's me again -
      The photo below was rejected for being underexposed and for contrast reasons:
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7078442
      Could someone please clarify some features of the photo that matched these criteria for rejection? I'm not too sure where the problem would be
      Thank you so much in advance!
      The whole photo lacks both, highlights and shadows. Should be an easy fix by adjusting the curves.
      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
        The whole photo lacks both, highlights and shadows. Should be an easy fix by adjusting the curves.
        Okay; thank you!

        Comment


        • #19
          Hi,
          There’s another photo whose rejection reasons baffle me - could anyone be so kind as to explain how the categories apply?
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7196069
          Thank you!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Natalie Huang View Post
            Hi,
            There’s another photo whose rejection reasons baffle me - could anyone be so kind as to explain how the categories apply?
            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7196069
            Thank you!
            Night Shot should apply.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              Night Shot should apply.
              Thank you! Can I also ask about the reasons why it's considered undersharpened, and where the jpg compression artifacts are seen?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Natalie Huang View Post
                Thank you! Can I also ask about the reasons why it's considered undersharpened, and where the jpg compression artifacts are seen?
                Aircraft is soft towards the tail (see the registration), and the sky is noisy (not really a compression problem, actually). Neither are really severe problems, but they are noticeable.

                Comment

                Working...
                X