Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Editing Help

    Hello
    This photo was rejected twice
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7045014
    in both of them "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing", I would like you to help me and tell me what I am doing wrong and what I can do to correct this and other rejections I have had for the same reason, I only use the LR


    grateful


    Rui

  • #2
    Originally posted by rui cardoso View Post
    Hello
    This photo was rejected twice
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7045014
    in both of them "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing", I would like you to help me and tell me what I am doing wrong and what I can do to correct this and other rejections I have had for the same reason, I only use the LR


    grateful


    Rui
    There are editing halos visible. They are especially prominent around the bottom of the aircraft.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by rui cardoso View Post
      Hello
      This photo was rejected twice
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7045014
      in both of them "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing", I would like you to help me and tell me what I am doing wrong and what I can do to correct this and other rejections I have had for the same reason, I only use the LR


      grateful


      Rui
      For me that is okay...

      Comment


      • #4
        Hello
        I have this rejection
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8424623
        Can someone tell me why "Categories wrong or missing"

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by rui cardoso View Post
          Hello
          I have this rejection
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8424623
          Can someone tell me why "Categories wrong or missing"
          Small Prop.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Small Prop.
            I already know why I didn't put a small prop, the guide line says "To be used for small props which have been designed for up to 10 passengers" but the Cessna website says it is for a maximum of 10-14 occupants, that is, it allows 14 passengers.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by rui cardoso View Post

              I already know why I didn't put a small prop, the guide line says "To be used for small props which have been designed for up to 10 passengers" but the Cessna website says it is for a maximum of 10-14 occupants, that is, it allows 14 passengers.
              Ok, then in that case the category rejection was a mistake. You can leave a note on the next upload that it seats more than 10+ passengers if you are sure of that.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                Ok, then in that case the category rejection was a mistake. You can leave a note on the next upload that it seats more than 10+ passengers if you are sure of that.
                I was checking it and because of the serial number this is a Grand Caravan 208B, you can also see it through the side windows, the 208B has eight and the 208 only six, I already submitted a correction in the most recent photo of the base

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi, i take this photos in Angola, Cabinda airport in 2012 and Huambo in 2015 with a small pocket camera, at the time i didnīt do plane spotting.
                  Will there be interest in having these photos on the base and appear in the FR associated with the airport? At the moment there is nothing, I know that the quality is poor but between having nothing or having these until someone submits another one will be interesting for the aeronautical community.
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rui cardoso View Post
                    Hi, i take this photos in Angola, Cabinda airport in 2012 and Huambo in 2015 with a small pocket camera, at the time i didnīt do plane spotting.
                    Will there be interest in having these photos on the base and appear in the FR associated with the airport? At the moment there is nothing, I know that the quality is poor but between having nothing or having these until someone submits another one will be interesting for the aeronautical community.
                    Second one would be a motive rejection, but if you have a something similar to the first that isn't blurry, it may be acceptable.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                      Second one would be a motive rejection, but if you have a something similar to the first that isn't blurry, it may be acceptable.
                      I only have this one, but for me, the first one is better, the fire truck is sharper, especially the letters "BOMBEIROS".
                      I know she can be rejected, but iīm gonna trie, in your opinion which has more possibilities?
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by rui cardoso View Post

                        I only have this one, but for me, the first one is better, the fire truck is sharper, especially the letters "BOMBEIROS".
                        I know she can be rejected, but iīm gonna trie, in your opinion which has more possibilities?
                        Read my comments again. I said the second one would be a motive rejection. There is very little difference between that one and this, and so this one would also be a motive rejection.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hi, I don't know if this is the right place for this.
                          This photo is missing the badge.
                          https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9834984

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X