Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Adam Quinn - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Exposure acceptable for me. Softness issue remains.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0060-Edit 2edit 5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	507.1 KB
ID:	1032334Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0096-Edit-3 2edit number8.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	645.7 KB
ID:	1032335

    Another shot here, not sure if should just be thrown away

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0139.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	639.6 KB
ID:	1032336

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Adam Quinn View Post
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]21074[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21075[/ATTACH]

      Another shot here, not sure if should just be thrown away

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]21076[/ATTACH]
      Also a bit soft.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        Also a bit soft.
        All sharpened further

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0060-Edit 2edit 6.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	509.6 KB
ID:	1032342Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0096-Edit-3 2edit number9.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	645.7 KB
ID:	1032343Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0139 edit 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	633.8 KB
ID:	1032345

        New shot, not sure if its acceptable due to the angle.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0210 edit 1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	472.2 KB
ID:	1032344

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Adam Quinn View Post
          All sharpened further

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]21082[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21083[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21085[/ATTACH]

          New shot, not sure if its acceptable due to the angle.

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]21084[/ATTACH]
          1 looks slightly blurry (titles, nose)
          2, 3 OK
          4 angle OK, but the chopped off stab looks too weird.
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
            1 looks slightly blurry (titles, nose)
            Done some localised sharpening
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0060-Edit 2edit 7.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	529.5 KB
ID:	1032352

            Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
            4 angle OK, but the chopped off stab looks too weird.
            Shame it was chopped off in the original photo

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Adam Quinn View Post
              Done some localised sharpening
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]21093[/ATTACH]



              Shame it was chopped off in the original photo
              The BA A319 look OK now IMO.
              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                The BA A319 look OK now IMO.
                Brilliant thank you once again LX and Dlowwa, couldn't do any of this without your help.

                Comment


                • #38
                  5 More

                  OK-PBS
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0682.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	687.9 KB
ID:	1032472

                  9H-PAL
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0748.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	745.5 KB
ID:	1032473

                  G-FDZF
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0779.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	662.0 KB
ID:	1032474

                  C-GTSN
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0814.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	695.7 KB
ID:	1032475

                  F-HBLB
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0823.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	594.6 KB
ID:	1032476

                  Cheers
                  Adam

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Adam Quinn View Post
                    5 More

                    OK-PBS
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21228[/ATTACH]

                    9H-PAL
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21229[/ATTACH]

                    G-FDZF
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21230[/ATTACH]

                    C-GTSN
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21231[/ATTACH]

                    F-HBLB
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21232[/ATTACH]

                    Cheers
                    Adam
                    1. contrast, soft/heat haze
                    2. contrast, soft
                    3. contrast
                    4. centering, contrast, soft/heat haze
                    5. centering, contrast, soft

                    #2 is the only one that appears possibly fixable; the rest I would not bother with.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      1. contrast, soft/heat haze
                      2. contrast, soft
                      3. contrast
                      4. centering, contrast, soft/heat haze
                      5. centering, contrast, soft

                      #2 is the only one that appears possibly fixable; the rest I would not bother with.
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0748-Recoverededit 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	731.2 KB
ID:	1032477
                      Better?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Adam Quinn View Post
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]21237[/ATTACH]
                        Better?
                        Unfortunately no, maybe even worse. Perhaps the quality is not there for this one either.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          Unfortunately no, maybe even worse. Perhaps the quality is not there for this one either.
                          Oh well it was worth the shot, those 5 were from my first ever spotting trip so I'm not totally surprised, thanks anyways though.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            These two rejected today

                            1. Too much/little contrast

                            I assume it was too much contrast so here's the rejected one Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0096-Edit-3 2edit number9.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	645.7 KB
ID:	1032489 Reduced contrast: Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0096-Edit-3 2edit number10.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	636.0 KB
ID:	1032490

                            2. Undersharpened (Soft), Part of aircraft cut off, Vignetting not allowed

                            Original Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0139 EDIT 4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	601.6 KB
ID:	1032491 Sharpened, I think there is a mistake for the part of aircraft cut off because what looks like the right horizontal stabiliser is actually the wing of the EK A380 behind it. De-Vignetted Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0139edit 5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	645.7 KB
ID:	1032492

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Adam Quinn View Post
                              These two rejected today

                              1. Too much/little contrast

                              I assume it was too much contrast so here's the rejected one [ATTACH=CONFIG]21250[/ATTACH] Reduced contrast: [ATTACH=CONFIG]21251[/ATTACH]

                              2. Undersharpened (Soft), Part of aircraft cut off, Vignetting not allowed

                              Original [ATTACH=CONFIG]21252[/ATTACH] Sharpened, I think there is a mistake for the part of aircraft cut off because what looks like the right horizontal stabiliser is actually the wing of the EK A380 behind it. De-Vignetted [ATTACH=CONFIG]21253[/ATTACH]
                              First looks fine, but second not so much. The softness looks like it's due to NR or some other compression inducing effect, and more sharpening doesn't really help.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                First looks fine, but second not so much. The softness looks like it's due to NR or some other compression inducing effect, and more sharpening doesn't really help.
                                Doesn't look great on the front to be honest. Should I appeal the first one?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X