Help on rejected photo - minhtrankhiem

[dlowwa]

Those blocks usually appears after I do the noise reduction and resizing.
Moreover, are there anyway to clear my name up or I just keep getting rejection like this in the future?
Thanks!

Your name doesn't need to be 'cleared up'. You've been caught twice, and that's on your record. The third one was just a failure to extend you the benefit of the doubt on a questionable image. There were no further repercussions for that one other than the rejection. As long as you don't submit any more images that have been intentionally manipulated (filling in the frame, removing objects, etc..) you have nothing to worry about.

[minhtrankhiem]

Hello everyone,
I'm reposting from a different thread. I thought that I need another thread for a different case. Sorry for that!

Turning back to the problem, I've just had a rejection, here is the link to the image: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7157106

Can you help me on how to improve this image? I don't know what's wrong with this one.

Thank you very much!

Regards,

[comet1]

Hi,

maybe there is a minimal red tint. But this is quite subjective. The other issues, espicially digital manipulation, I cannot see at all.
Brgds

Rainer

[dlowwa]

Hello everyone,
I'm reposting from a different thread. I thought that I need another thread for a different case. Sorry for that!

Turning back to the problem, I've just had a rejection, here is the link to the image: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7157106

Can you help me on how to improve this image? I don't know what's wrong with this one.

Thank you very much!

Regards,

It could simply be the effect of a wide angle + filter that is causing the darkening pattern in the upper part of the sky, but since you've stripped the exif, it's difficult to tell.

[minhtrankhiem]

It could simply be the effect of a wide angle + filter that is causing the darkening pattern in the upper part of the sky, but since you've stripped the exif, it's difficult to tell.

Hi, thank you for your reply.

I always include Exif data with my picture. The reason it doesn't show on this image could be because it was rejected.

You could find the Exif data here, on the original file come straight out of the camera.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=19iTXkqPMWGPaHyVu79hjhllBbBfxD2jf

Regards,
Minh

[dlowwa]

Hi, thank you for your reply.

I always include Exif data with my picture. The reason it doesn't show on this image could be because it was rejected.

You could find the Exif data here, on the original file come straight out of the camera.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=19iTXkqPMWGPaHyVu79hjhllBbBfxD2jf

Regards,
Minh

Thanks for having enough confidence in the process to post that. Having seen the original, I can now say that the rejection should have been for overprocessed only, with the color being a subjective issue (slightly oversaturated). As I suspected, the overprocessing is due to the top corners being much brighter than the center of the frame, which is much darker towards the top-center. This could possibly due to too much vignetting correction, or some other software/editing function. With a better, re-processed image, it should be acceptable.

[minhtrankhiem]

Thanks for having enough confidence in the process to post that. Having seen the original, I can now say that the rejection should have been for overprocessed only, with the color being a subjective issue (slightly oversaturated). As I suspected, the overprocessing is due to the top corners being much brighter than the center of the frame, which is much darker towards the top-center. This could possibly due to too much vignetting correction, or some other software/editing function. With a better, re-processed image, it should be acceptable.

Thank you for your answer, I'm now clear on what's wrong with this photo.

Best regards,
Minh