[Editing advice] Pre-screening

[dlowwa]

Better now?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]24115[/ATTACH]

Maybe a little.

[Walker_Xu]

Image is soft and a little dark.

Better now?

[dlowwa]

Not sure if this is an acceptable image. But I do see some beautiful backlit photos recently. So why not have a try.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]24090[/ATTACH]

Image is soft and a little dark.

[Walker_Xu]

Not sure if this is an acceptable image. But I do see some beautiful backlit photos recently. So why not have a try.

[dlowwa]

Hi I think this photo is acceptable. The exposure and contrast is as good as my previous photos. Well I still want to ask if it is worth to appeal. Thank you.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7256764

A bit dark, but exposure would have been ok for me. I do agree contrast is too flat, however.

[Walker_Xu]

Hi I think this photo is acceptable. The exposure and contrast is as good as my previous photos. Well I still want to ask if it is worth to appeal. Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7256764

[dlowwa]

I got a photo of the EL AL 4X-EDD special SCHEME yesterday at CYYZ, is it still a valid hot photo?

No longer hot.

[Ben Long]

I got a photo of the EL AL 4X-EDD special SCHEME yesterday at CYYZ, is it still a valid hot photo?

If it has been longer than 48hrs of the first upload of the aircraft in its special scheme, then it will not count as hot as far as I know.

[Walker_Xu]

I got a photo of the EL AL 4X-EDD special SCHEME yesterday at CYYZ, is it still a valid hot photo?

[dlowwa]

Are these two dirty or not? I dont think there are any other issues other than that.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23797[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23798[/ATTACH]

I don't see any dust spots, but there is vignetting on the first and the second is borderline dark.

[Walker_Xu]

Are these two dirty or not? I dont think there are any other issues other than that.

[dlowwa]

Got some first registrations today. However the Vignette is strange and I dont know if they are acceptable.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23755[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23756[/ATTACH]

Yes, there is some poor processing causing halo effect in the sky, probably from poor vignetting correction.

[Walker_Xu]

Got some first registrations today. However the Vignette is strange and I dont know if they are acceptable.

[dlowwa]

Sure I will take that. So is there any major issues of this photo?c Also I have A another image in Q so if it is a "night shot" I will correct the information. I know I cannot pre-screen the photo in Q but I just want to double check if the information is right.(rejected by the wrong category is really stupid haha). Thanks again.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235124

Yes, you can use 'Night Shot' here. If unsure, just leave a message to the screeners with future uploads, and we will almost always correct the category for you if there are no other problems.

[Walker_Xu]

You're welcome to your opinion of course, but it might be a good idea to listen to someone who actually screens the images and knows the guidelines. To point, you might want to read here:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthread.php?58983-UPLOAD-GUIDELINES-New-version

2.2 Categories

Night Shots
This category should apply for photos taken at dawn, dusk and night. For Dusk and Dawn photos these should show a red-orange glow and long shadows.

This describes your image exactly.

Sure I will take that. So is there any major issues of this photo?c Also I have A another image in Q so if it is a "night shot" I will correct the information. I know I cannot pre-screen the photo in Q but I just want to double check if the information is right.(rejected by the wrong category is really stupid haha). Thanks again.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235124