Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft, color
    2. borderline noise
    3. borderline centering
    4. soft/heat haze, borderline dark
    5. soft, noise, too far, borderline dark/contrast
    Okay ill try my chances with the borderlines and ditch the last.
    How's 1 now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	c-gkwa.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	748.5 KB
ID:	1077249

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello,may I have a prescreen please?
    1. soft, color
    2. borderline noise
    3. borderline centering
    4. soft/heat haze, borderline dark
    5. soft, noise, too far, borderline dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Hello,may I have a prescreen please?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	c-gkwa.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	751.2 KB
ID:	1077231
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ja731a.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	682.0 KB
ID:	1077232
    Click image for larger version

Name:	lkRNU.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	403.5 KB
ID:	1077233
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n838aw.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	716.9 KB
ID:	1077234
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n66837.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	793.7 KB
ID:	1077235

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post

    I’ll save 2 for personal, do you think 1 is worth an appeal or would it better with some noise reduction/ a decrease in contrast?
    I'd accept the appeal, but couldn't promise the same from anyone else, so your call.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline on the first, but the noise is really noticeable on the second. You were shooting ISO400, which means the noise was totally avoidable on your part, so..
    I see, thanks, I recall I was using ISO auto when these shots were taken. ( first time using that camera)

    I’ll save 2 for personal, do you think 1 is worth an appeal or would it better with some noise reduction/ a decrease in contrast?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello may I have some advice about these rejections:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7733217 <- this one was rejected at first for just dust, and second time around for noise/contrast. (I believe harsh)

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7733210 <- same rejects (but first time submitting)

    Do you believe noise problems are too severe for the photos to be saved? Thanks.
    Borderline on the first, but the noise is really noticeable on the second. You were shooting ISO400, which means the noise was totally avoidable on your part, so..

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Hello may I have some advice about these rejections:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7733217 <- this one was rejected at first for just dust, and second time around for noise/contrast. (I believe harsh)

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7733210 <- same rejects (but first time submitting)

    Do you believe noise problems are too severe for the photos to be saved? Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post

    I see, do you think any of them would have a chance, if not I’ll just get better angles next time I go.
    thanks.
    You could try if you wanted, but like I said, both would be rejections for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Neither of those two crops work for me personally. All of the accepted ones have better perspectives.
    I see, do you think any of them would have a chance, if not I’ll just get better angles next time I go.
    thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello would any of these two be accpetable? (Here's some accepted pictures for more context)
    Neither of those two crops work for me personally. All of the accepted ones have better perspectives.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Hello would any of these two be accpetable? (Here's some accepted pictures for more context https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/N219BA )

    Worried about centering, motive, and contrast.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n219ba.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	781.9 KB
ID:	1075652
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n219ba2.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	826.4 KB
ID:	1075653
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post

    I'll add 1 to the queue. Do you think that 2 will have a chance with some noise reduction?
    I applied carefully, perhaps, but it also tends to smear out details, so couldn't say for sure.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Still borderline dark/contrast.



    Not really.
    I'll add 1 to the queue. Do you think that 2 will have a chance with some noise reduction?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post

    I'll try my chances with 1.
    How's the contrast, it seems flat now.
    Still borderline dark/contrast.

    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    and this was rejected for noise
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7708119
    worth an appeal?
    Not really.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline oversharpened/centering
    2. yes, too dark/harshly contrasted
    I'll try my chances with 1.
    How's the contrast, it seems flat now.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	n950ua2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	524.5 KB ID:	1075195
    and this was rejected for noise
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7708119
    worth an appeal?
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X