Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    hello, I had these two rejected for soft, and overexposed. I attempted to appeal the a320, but failed. (Had to rework since that original raw was on my laptop)
    I sharpened them some more, but I fear that I oversharpened, and is exposure acceptable now? Thanks.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29718[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29719[/ATTACH]
    Both are still a bit too soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    hello, I had these two rejected for soft, and overexposed. I attempted to appeal the a320, but failed. (Had to rework since that original raw was on my laptop)
    I sharpened them some more, but I fear that I oversharpened, and is exposure acceptable now? Thanks.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	n843va.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	393.1 KB
ID:	1043672
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n195sy.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	387.0 KB
ID:	1043673

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    hello, is this too backlit?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29702[/ATTACH]
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    hello, is this too backlit?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n63890.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	475.7 KB
ID:	1043659

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Last one before I attempt to submit:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29621[/ATTACH]

    Is the color better? I sharpened some more, but don't want to oversharpen.
    Thanks.
    It looks acceptable to me

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Last one before I attempt to submit:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n38950v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	416.7 KB
ID:	1043589

    Is the color better? I sharpened some more, but don't want to oversharpen.
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Will save the rest for personal.

    I think I found a sharper shot for the last one, hows sharpness/contrast now?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29615[/ATTACH]

    Thanks.
    Borderline for soft and slight yellow/green tint.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    You are correct, softness and contrast (except for the last) is an issue for all of them. Only the last one is fixable.
    Will save the rest for personal.

    I think I found a sharper shot for the last one, hows sharpness/contrast now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n38950v2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	415.2 KB
ID:	1043585

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, I have a prescreen?
    The Sun got blocked when I arrived so I am worried about lack of contrast. Softness as well.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29611[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29612[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29613[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29614[/ATTACH]
    You are correct, softness and contrast (except for the last) is an issue for all of them. Only the last one is fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Hello, I have a prescreen?
    The Sun got blocked when I arrived so I am worried about lack of contrast. Softness as well.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	a7bfh.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	442.4 KB
ID:	1043581
    Click image for larger version

Name:	hkaz39.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	410.9 KB
ID:	1043582
    Click image for larger version

Name:	lnrku.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	505.5 KB
ID:	1043583
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n38950.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	365.1 KB
ID:	1043584

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    First borderline soft/heat hazed yes; both also borderline overexposed.
    Thanks, I’ll bring the exposure down before trying to submit.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, may I get a prescreen. Worried about softness/heathaze on both.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29489[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29490[/ATTACH]
    First borderline soft/heat hazed yes; both also borderline overexposed.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Hello, may I get a prescreen. Worried about softness/heathaze on both.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	daigs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	412.4 KB
ID:	1043486
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n617cz.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	354.2 KB
ID:	1043487

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    hello dana, would 2 be considered hot since it has a new paintjob compared to its most recent?.
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    hello dana, would 2 be considered hot since it has a new paintjob compared to its most recent?
    N361QS. Cessna 680 Citation Sovereign. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    thanks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X