Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Should be ok; taking a second look now you might also want to sharpen them a bit more to be safe
    Thanks again, I’ll sharpen them before submitting.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    How's the color now?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29412[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29413[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29414[/ATTACH]
    Should be ok; taking a second look now you might also want to sharpen them a bit more to be safe

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    How's the color now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n343qs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	428.6 KB
ID:	1043428
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n361qs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	417.5 KB
ID:	1043429
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n468wn.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	435.0 KB
ID:	1043430

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, may I have a prescreen? Too yellow due to sunset? If acceptable, night shot applies correct?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29393[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29394[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29395[/ATTACH]
    A bit green, yes, and night shot does apply. Also somewhat soft.

    Also this was rejected for soft, do you believe it's fixable with more sharpening?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n101nn2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	356.1 KB
ID:	1043416[/QUOTE]

    Possibly, but probably needs a whole new edit since this one is quite soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Hello, may I have a prescreen? Too yellow due to sunset? If acceptable, night shot applies correct?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n343qs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	427.6 KB
ID:	1043413
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n361qs.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	416.5 KB
ID:	1043414
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n468wn.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	434.8 KB
ID:	1043415

    Also this was rejected for soft, do you believe it's fixable with more sharpening?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n101nn2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	356.1 KB
ID:	1043416

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes on both counts. Also noisy and weak contrast.
    Thank you, will keep for personal.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29053[/ATTACH]

    Hello, may I have a prescreen? Worried about softness/backlit.
    Yes on both counts. Also noisy and weak contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n933fd.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	514.6 KB
ID:	1043119

    Hello, may I have a prescreen? Worried about softness/backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • cyx323
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28904[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28905[/ATTACH]

    hello, may i have a prescreen? lacking contrast/too soft?
    thanks
    1. Horizon, contrast.
    2. Soft, contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	b16223ac.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	796.7 KB
ID:	1042992
    Click image for larger version

Name:	rpc8961.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	609.7 KB
ID:	1042993

    hello, may i have a prescreen? lacking contrast/too soft?
    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    3, 4: slightly soft
    Thanks, I’ll try sharpening them up before I submit.

    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    5: Is more a photo of two photographers, not of a location
    I see, I’ll try to compose better next time I go, thanks again.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    hello may i get a prescreen, i am concerned about softness.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28473[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28474[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28475[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28476[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28477[/ATTACH] <- motive?
    1, 2: OK
    3, 4: slightly soft
    5: Is more a photo of two photographers, not of a location

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    hello may i get a prescreen, i am concerned about softness.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	hl7616.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	473.7 KB
ID:	1042623
    Click image for larger version

Name:	b2046.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	396.7 KB
ID:	1042624
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n101nn.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.9 KB
ID:	1042625
    Click image for larger version

Name:	n132an.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	614.3 KB
ID:	1042626
    Click image for larger version

Name:	klax2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	935.1 KB
ID:	1042627 <- motive?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    I see, so would in this case moving to the side/back where you have more of a view of the benches better for next time?
    Or would moving forward so that people’s heads aren’t in the way be better?
    Thanks.
    Spotting location images actually need to show the location, so yes, a bit better view of the area would be recommended.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThatOneFish
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Soft, and poorly centered, but would also be a motive rejection for me. Is this trying to show the sky, or the back of the guy's head and the other guy's ear? Spotting location needs to actually show the location, not just parts of people there.
    I see, so would in this case moving to the side/back where you have more of a view of the benches better for next time?
    Or would moving forward so that people’s heads aren’t in the way be better?
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X