Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prescreening Request

    Hello

    I'm relatively new here and would like some photos prescreened. All photos attached are hot.

    Thank you
    -Luca Flores
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N3119R(Hot).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.1 KB
ID:	1045920Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3378.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	365.2 KB
ID:	1045921Click image for larger version

Name:	N53440(Hot).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	513.3 KB
ID:	1045922Click image for larger version

Name:	N28LE(Hot).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	585.4 KB
ID:	1045923

  • #2
    Hi,
    Not a screener so don't take what I say as the final word, but all look ok except for N53440, which looks a little soft especially t the nose.
    Have a great day,
    Tim.



    https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/
    https://www.instagram.com/crosswind_...ography/?hl=en

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
      Hello

      I'm relatively new here and would like some photos prescreened. All photos attached are hot.

      Thank you
      -Luca Flores
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22218[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22219[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22220[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22221[/ATTACH]
      1. borderline dark/contrast
      2. ok
      3. soft/heat haze, borderline horizon (CW)
      4. ok

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks, folks! I appreciate the responses.

        Regards,
        Luca Flores

        Comment


        • #5
          Hello
          Here is another batch of prescreening requests.

          Thank you
          Luca Flores

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1557.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	342.9 KB
ID:	1033410Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3100.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	265.2 KB
ID:	1033411Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4988.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	397.0 KB
ID:	1033412Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2082.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	389.3 KB
ID:	1033413Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4815.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	376.9 KB
ID:	1033414

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
            Hello
            Here is another batch of prescreening requests.

            Thank you
            Luca Flores

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]22376[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22377[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22378[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22379[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22380[/ATTACH]
            1. contrast
            2. overprocessed
            3. borderline contrast
            4-5 ok

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              1. contrast
              2. overprocessed
              3. borderline contrast
              4-5 ok
              Thanks, dlowwa. Can you specify if 1 and 3 are over or under contrasted, please?

              Regards,
              Luca Flores

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                Thanks, dlowwa. Can you specify if 1 and 3 are over or under contrasted, please?

                Regards,
                Luca Flores
                Under.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.

                  Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?

                  Thank you
                  Luca Flores

                  https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7176051

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                    Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.

                    Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?

                    Thank you
                    Luca Flores

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7176051
                    Contrast is too low due to the overcast conditions. Why do you think it qualifies for hot?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Qualifies for hot because the most recent photo of N68817 shows the bottom scimitars attached. Didn't have the bottom scimitars when I spotted it. Also, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                        Qualifies for hot because the most recent photo of N68817 shows the bottom scimitars attached. Didn't have the bottom scimitars when I spotted it.
                        Only permanent changes to equipment qualify as hot. Temporary changes, as this is, do not.

                        Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                        Also, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds
                        Overcast means there was a cloud between the sun and the aircraft...you say it was not overcast, but there was a cloud. Those are contradictory statements.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot. And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                            If only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot.
                            The winglet could be repaired in days. I'm assuming you're referring to special paint schemes, which typically last months, or years.

                            Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                            And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo
                            I am pretty sure there is at least some high layer of could between the sun in the aircraft in that image, as the contrast is far too low for it to be direct light.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hello. Could someone please prescreen these for me?

                              Thank you
                              Luca Flores

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6520-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	359.4 KB
ID:	1033504Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6483-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	349.9 KB
ID:	1033505Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5892-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	389.3 KB
ID:	1033506Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5688-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	461.6 KB
ID:	1033507

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X