Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hey again

    Would someone mind prescreening these for me?

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23252[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23253[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23254[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23255[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline contrast
    2. soft
    3. borderline soft
    4. ok

    Comment


    • #47
      Thanks

      I fixed 1, 2, and 3. Please let me know if they are any better.

      Luca Flores

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0449-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	329.0 KB
ID:	1034135Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0500-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	511.0 KB
ID:	1034136Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0605-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	359.7 KB
ID:	1034137

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
        Thanks

        I fixed 1, 2, and 3. Please let me know if they are any better.

        Luca Flores

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]23262[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23263[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23264[/ATTACH]
        1 & 3 would be ok for me; 2 still soft towards the nose.

        Comment


        • #49
          I sharpened the DC-3 some more. Also, please let me know if this next batch is OK.

          Thanks
          Luca Flores

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0500-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.0 KB
ID:	1034146Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0657.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	304.8 KB
ID:	1034147Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0889.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	347.3 KB
ID:	1034148Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1172-3.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	358.0 KB
ID:	1034149Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1101.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	314.5 KB
ID:	1034150

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
            I sharpened the DC-3 some more.
            Still borderline, but would be ok for me.

            Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
            Also, please let me know if this next batch is OK.

            Thanks
            Luca Flores
            Please read here thoroughly, especially #3:

            https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

            Comment


            • #51
              sorry. I thought that because they were the same images as the day before I could post a new batch. I'll repost again tomorrow.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                sorry. I thought that because they were the same images as the day before I could post a new batch. I'll repost again tomorrow.
                Those are not the same images as the day before.

                Comment


                • #53
                  No I mean the A350, DC-3, and A321 were the same photos as the day before so I thought I could post a new batch. Anyway, its not important

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Alright now that it's past 8 could someone prescreen these photos please?

                    Thanks
                    Luca Flores

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0889.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	347.3 KB
ID:	1034157Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1101.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	314.5 KB
ID:	1034158Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1172-3.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	358.0 KB
ID:	1034159Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0657.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	304.8 KB
ID:	1034160Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1016.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	347.7 KB
ID:	1034161

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                      Alright now that it's past 8 could someone prescreen these photos please?

                      Thanks
                      Luca Flores

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]23294[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23295[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23296[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23297[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23298[/ATTACH]
                      Middle three borderline for contrast, but otherwise don't see any major issues.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Hello

                        Could I get these 4 photos prescreened please?

                        Also this photo got rejected. Worth an appeal?

                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7228244

                        Thanks
                        Luca Flores

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1570.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.8 KB
ID:	1034364Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8248.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	407.7 KB
ID:	1034365Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8067.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	300.6 KB
ID:	1034366Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8050.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	298.6 KB
ID:	1034367

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                          Also this photo got rejected. Worth an appeal?
                          Borderline, but would have been ok for me.

                          Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]23567[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23568[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23569[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23570[/ATTACH]
                          Slight softness/heat haze on first, and slight editing halos on rest, but would be ok for me.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Hello

                            Are these photos worth an appeal? I was told all 3 would be acceptable in this thread.

                            Thanks
                            Luca Flores

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7233309

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7233198

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7233197

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Oh also this one

                              Thanks

                              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7231953

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
                                Hello

                                Are these photos worth an appeal? I was told all 3 would be acceptable in this thread.

                                Thanks
                                Luca Flores

                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7233309

                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7233198

                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7233197
                                Dust spots, missed categories, and images that were mentioned as borderline I can't help you with. The AC that was rejected for dark, while it obviously would have been ok for me, I can see why someone might have looked at the histogram and decided it was too dark, so that's your decision if you want to appeal.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X