Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    If only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot.
    The winglet could be repaired in days. I'm assuming you're referring to special paint schemes, which typically last months, or years.

    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo
    I am pretty sure there is at least some high layer of could between the sun in the aircraft in that image, as the contrast is far too low for it to be direct light.

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    replied
    If only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot. And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Qualifies for hot because the most recent photo of N68817 shows the bottom scimitars attached. Didn't have the bottom scimitars when I spotted it.
    Only permanent changes to equipment qualify as hot. Temporary changes, as this is, do not.

    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Also, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds
    Overcast means there was a cloud between the sun and the aircraft...you say it was not overcast, but there was a cloud. Those are contradictory statements.

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    replied
    Qualifies for hot because the most recent photo of N68817 shows the bottom scimitars attached. Didn't have the bottom scimitars when I spotted it. Also, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.

    Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?

    Thank you
    Luca Flores

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7176051
    Contrast is too low due to the overcast conditions. Why do you think it qualifies for hot?

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    replied
    Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.

    Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?

    Thank you
    Luca Flores

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7176051

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Thanks, dlowwa. Can you specify if 1 and 3 are over or under contrasted, please?

    Regards,
    Luca Flores
    Under.

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. contrast
    2. overprocessed
    3. borderline contrast
    4-5 ok
    Thanks, dlowwa. Can you specify if 1 and 3 are over or under contrasted, please?

    Regards,
    Luca Flores

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hello
    Here is another batch of prescreening requests.

    Thank you
    Luca Flores

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22376[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22377[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22378[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22379[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22380[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast
    2. overprocessed
    3. borderline contrast
    4-5 ok

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    replied
    Hello
    Here is another batch of prescreening requests.

    Thank you
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1557.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	342.9 KB
ID:	1033410Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3100.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	265.2 KB
ID:	1033411Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4988.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	397.0 KB
ID:	1033412Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2082.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	389.3 KB
ID:	1033413Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4815.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	376.9 KB
ID:	1033414

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    replied
    Thanks, folks! I appreciate the responses.

    Regards,
    Luca Flores

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hello

    I'm relatively new here and would like some photos prescreened. All photos attached are hot.

    Thank you
    -Luca Flores
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22218[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22219[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22220[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22221[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline dark/contrast
    2. ok
    3. soft/heat haze, borderline horizon (CW)
    4. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • CrosswindPhoto
    replied
    Hi,
    Not a screener so don't take what I say as the final word, but all look ok except for N53440, which looks a little soft especially t the nose.
    Have a great day,
    Tim.

    Leave a comment:


  • klax_spotting
    started a topic Prescreening Request

    Prescreening Request

    Hello

    I'm relatively new here and would like some photos prescreened. All photos attached are hot.

    Thank you
    -Luca Flores
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N3119R(Hot).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.1 KB
ID:	1045920Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3378.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	365.2 KB
ID:	1045921Click image for larger version

Name:	N53440(Hot).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	513.3 KB
ID:	1045922Click image for larger version

Name:	N28LE(Hot).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	585.4 KB
ID:	1045923
Working...
X