If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo
I am pretty sure there is at least some high layer of could between the sun in the aircraft in that image, as the contrast is far too low for it to be direct light.
If only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot. And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo
Also, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds
Overcast means there was a cloud between the sun and the aircraft...you say it was not overcast, but there was a cloud. Those are contradictory statements.
Qualifies for hot because the most recent photo of N68817 shows the bottom scimitars attached. Didn't have the bottom scimitars when I spotted it. Also, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds
Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.
Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?
Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.
Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?
Hi,
Not a screener so don't take what I say as the final word, but all look ok except for N53440, which looks a little soft especially t the nose.
Have a great day,
Tim.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: