Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dp.aviation02 Pre-Screening/Editing Advice thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    Hey,

    Could I get these pre screened?

    Thanks!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26862[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26863[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26864[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    2. borderline backlit
    3. overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Hey,

    Could I get these pre screened?

    Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	AS 739 N402AS JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	463.0 KB
ID:	1041291

    Click image for larger version

Name:	LH A380 D-AIMG JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	422.8 KB
ID:	1041292

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ANZ 77w ZK-OKP JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	409.4 KB
ID:	1041293

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    Hey,

    I got all of these rejected for being "backlit" and "almost backlit". I appealed one, and was told it was "either way poor lighting" but i had gotten another photo I had taken minutes before that one accepted (which is why I appealed)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26764[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26765[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26766[/ATTACH]


    Because of that, I would like to get these two pre screened before i upload them.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26767[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26769[/ATTACH]
    The AA is partially backlit, the rest more or less completely. And yes, this borderline backlighting would be considered poor light in general.

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Hey,

    I got all of these rejected for being "backlit" and "almost backlit". I appealed one, and was told it was "either way poor lighting" but i had gotten another photo I had taken minutes before that one accepted (which is why I appealed)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	AA 738 N826NN JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	452.0 KB
ID:	1041209

    Click image for larger version

Name:	UA 757-2 N29124 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	500.9 KB
ID:	1041210

    Click image for larger version

Name:	UA A320 N485UA JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	475.9 KB
ID:	1041211


    Because of that, I would like to get these two pre screened before i upload them.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CX 77W B-KQI 1wld JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	457.8 KB
ID:	1041212
    Click image for larger version

Name:	UA 738 N69847 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	428.4 KB
ID:	1041213

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    Hey,

    Could I get these pre screened?

    I sharpened the lufthansa here:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26582[/ATTACH]

    Wasnt sure about this one:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26585[/ATTACH]

    I wasnt sure if the blue on blue worked or not:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26583[/ATTACH]

    Was unsure about the lighting:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26584[/ATTACH]

    Thanks alot!
    1. borderline soft
    2. borderline backlit
    3. ok
    4. borderline backlit

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Hey,

    Could I get these pre screened?

    I sharpened the lufthansa here:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	LH D-ABYU 748 JP 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	649.1 KB
ID:	1041050

    Wasnt sure about this one:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EK 77w A7-EQG JP charter.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.8 KB
ID:	1041053

    I wasnt sure if the blue on blue worked or not:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	KL PH-BHF 789 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	456.7 KB
ID:	1041051

    Was unsure about the lighting:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	UA 753 N57870 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	438.8 KB
ID:	1041052

    Thanks alot!

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Yeah haha. Nobody can agree 100% with anything. Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    The fedex was rejected for being backlit, however, I dont think that is necessarily fair that it was rejected when I could have gotten a screener that would be okay with the edit. Should I appeal it? I think it was toplit but I dont want to waste the screeners time if it is impossible to be accepted.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26548[/ATTACH]
    Looks backlit (and soft) to me. You do realize screeners don't agree with each other 100% of the time, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    Looks OK, as mentioned above. If anything, maybe the FedEx shows too much shadow from that angle. Some screeners may accept, some may reject for that.

    The fedex was rejected for being backlit, however, I dont think that is necessarily fair that it was rejected when I could have gotten a screener that would be okay with the edit. Should I appeal it? I think it was toplit but I dont want to waste the screeners time if it is impossible to be accepted.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	FE MD-11 N615FE JP 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	620.0 KB
ID:	1041018

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    Thanks. For the heat hazed ones, how can I determine whether or not a photo is worth editing and uploading at my editing level? I just noticed on the Alaska the belly towards the back is a bit jagged, and the nose wheel is kinda warped. Are those signs of heat haze?
    Usually can see it where there are straight, hard lines (leading edges, livery cheat lines/stripes, etc..). That's where I can see it on the AS, though it would be much easier if looking at the full-res version.

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. ok
    2. soft, overexposed, heat haze
    3. soft, borderline heat haze/backlit
    4. borderline soft
    Thanks. For the heat hazed ones, how can I determine whether or not a photo is worth editing and uploading at my editing level? I just noticed on the Alaska the belly towards the back is a bit jagged, and the nose wheel is kinda warped. Are those signs of heat haze?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    I lightened the Norwegian. and also had a couple more I wanted pre-screened. Since I am still fairly new, this is my first time shooting with summer light, so I will need a few pre-screened, this way I can learn how to edit accordingly.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26486[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26487[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26488[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26489[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    2. soft, overexposed, heat haze
    3. soft, borderline heat haze/backlit
    4. borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    I lightened the Norwegian. and also had a couple more I wanted pre-screened. Since I am still fairly new, this is my first time shooting with summer light, so I will need a few pre-screened, this way I can learn how to edit accordingly.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DI GC-KWIA 787-9 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	655.9 KB
ID:	1040964

    Click image for larger version

Name:	AS A320 N639VA JP.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	877.9 KB
ID:	1040965

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EVA B-16715 77w Star alliance JP.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	881.0 KB
ID:	1040966

    Click image for larger version

Name:	LH D-ABYU 748 JP.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	622.3 KB
ID:	1040967

    Leave a comment:


  • dp.aviation02
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Crop fine, but borderline dark. Not special.
    Ok thanks. I'll lighten it up a bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dp.aviation02 View Post
    Hey,
    Had a new angle I wanted to see if the crop and edit was good. Also, for norwegian, should I select special livery since they all have unique tails?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26456[/ATTACH]
    Crop fine, but borderline dark. Not special.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X