Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riojako - Prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    Dana,

    What are the minimum acceptable dimensions for a 1600px image?
    900-1200 (16:9 - 4:3)

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    Dana,

    What are the minimum acceptable dimensions for a 1600px image?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    Is the centering acceptable here? [ATTACH=CONFIG]25746[/ATTACH]
    Looks a bit high.

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    Is the centering acceptable here? Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4527.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	713.3 KB
ID:	1040310

    Leave a comment:


  • cyx323
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    I have removed all photos with gradients from the queue and I have re-edited them. Is this just too soft for a 1600px image?[ATTACH=CONFIG]25644[/ATTACH]
    Sharpeness should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    I have removed all photos with gradients from the queue and I have re-edited them. Is this just too soft for a 1600px image?Click image for larger version

Name:	Alaska 1600.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	750.0 KB
ID:	1040214

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    I noticed the taxi light there, but I used a gradient on the sky. It does not produce any halos but would it still be a overprocessed rejection if I applied something like that to any of my other photos?
    Gradient filters are considered manipulation/overprocessing, and will not only result in a rejection, but possibly a warning on your account as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    I noticed the taxi light there, but I used a gradient on the sky. It does not produce any halos but would it still be a overprocessed rejection if I applied something like that to any of my other photos?
    Definitely yes!

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    I noticed the taxi light there, but I used a gradient on the sky. It does not produce any halos but would it still be a overprocessed rejection if I applied something like that to any of my other photos?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    would this be acceptable for a 1600px image? As far as processing, sharpness and exposure? [ATTACH=CONFIG]25618[/ATTACH]
    Sharpness ok, but obstruction on the nose wheel, and looks like some kind of filter was added to the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    would this be acceptable for a 1600px image? As far as processing, sharpness and exposure? Click image for larger version

Name:	N493AS 1600.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1040194

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    I tried using smart sharpen on photoshop and I exported this as a JPG @1279px in bicubic sharper. Is there any improvement?[ATTACH=CONFIG]25528[/ATTACH]
    No, since unlike softness, you can't really fix blurry with more sharpening.

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    I tried using smart sharpen on photoshop and I exported this as a JPG @1279px in bicubic sharper. Is there any improvement?Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIXD 2 JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	608.2 KB
ID:	1040123

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by riojako View Post
    This is most definitely an improvement, but I cant tell if there are any halos though. Let me know what you think. [ATTACH=CONFIG]25522[/ATTACH]
    Contrast is improved yes, and halos are not an issue, though as I said, there appear to be other problems as well. Aircraft actually appears a bit blurry to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • riojako
    replied
    This is most definitely an improvement, but I cant tell if there are any halos though. Let me know what you think. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIXD JP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	574.1 KB
ID:	1040117

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X