Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening request - Ben Long

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Hi screeners,
    Could you please prescreen these images. Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0277.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	530.9 KB
ID:	1105326Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0066.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	554.0 KB
ID:	1105327Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0029.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1105328Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0198.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1105329Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC0169.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	1.40 MB
ID:	1105330
    Quality looks good on all of those, though I do see exposure/contrast being a (minor) potential issue on a few of them (1, 2, 5)

    Comment


    • #62
      Hi screeners,
      I'm very unsure about these images and would love some prescreening.
      Many thanks,
      Ben Long

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
        Hi screeners,
        I'm very unsure about these images and would love some prescreening.
        Many thanks,
        Ben Long
        Images seem to be corrupted.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Images seem to be corrupted.
          Strange. They appear fine on my end. Sorry about this.
          I'll try them again:
          Click image for larger version

Name:	image_37100.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	701.4 KB
ID:	1105805
          Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC0083.jpg Views:	0 Size:	385.0 KB ID:	1105804Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC0346.jpg Views:	0 Size:	703.7 KB ID:	1105806Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC0377.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.05 MB ID:	1105807Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC0254.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.42 MB ID:	1105808

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Ben Long View Post

            Strange. They appear fine on my end. Sorry about this.
            I'll try them again:
            1-3. ok for me
            4. contrast/dark
            5. borderline contrast

            Comment


            • #66
              Hi screeners,
              I'm also unsure about these images, please pre-screen them. Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC9896.jpg Views:	0 Size:	697.2 KB ID:	1105976
              Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC9447-Enhanced.jpg Views:	0 Size:	716.5 KB ID:	1105978Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC8853.jpg Views:	0 Size:	518.2 KB ID:	1105979Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC9934.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1,017.5 KB ID:	1105977Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC7774.jpg Views:	0 Size:	684.6 KB ID:	1105975

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
                Hi screeners,
                I'm also unsure about these images, please pre-screen them.
                1-3 borderline contrast (but ok for me)
                4. cut off, contrast
                5. ok for me

                Comment


                • #68
                  Hi screeners,
                  Thanks for your previous replies. Could you please pre-screen these images. Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC8687.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	585.7 KB
ID:	1106053Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC8684.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	647.8 KB
ID:	1106054Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9166.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	787.2 KB
ID:	1106055Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9133.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	816.2 KB
ID:	1106056Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC1052.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	707.6 KB
ID:	1106057

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
                    Hi screeners,
                    Thanks for your previous replies. Could you please pre-screen these images.
                    Quality looks good to me.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Hi screeners,
                      Recently I uploaded this image: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8751281 for prescreening and dlowwa said that he though it was okay. I understand that this is simply his opinion, I'm grateful for his support.
                      It was rejected for: "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)" and "Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots"
                      Please help me understand this rejection. I have, in all honestly, barely edited this image. I have added contrast and sharpness, and the colours don't seem very different to the original RAW file.
                      There were also clouds in the background, although faint. Perhaps the faint contours/definitions of the clouds in the background could be mistaken for a dust spot, as I don't really see anything out of the ordinary.
                      This photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9988157 was taken 3 hours prior to the rejected image, as you can see it was cloudy that day. The sun just peaked through the clouds allowing me to get some sunset light on the PC12, which is why I took the picture.
                      Here is a "before" picture with my edits. I wanted to make the sunset light as crisp as possible, which is why I added so much contrast:
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.PNG
Views:	58
Size:	200.1 KB
ID:	1106250
                      Regards,
                      Ben Long

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
                        Hi screeners,
                        Recently I uploaded this image: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8751281 for prescreening and dlowwa said that he though it was okay. I understand that this is simply his opinion, I'm grateful for his support.
                        It was rejected for: "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)" and "Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots"
                        Please help me understand this rejection. I have, in all honestly, barely edited this image. I have added contrast and sharpness, and the colours don't seem very different to the original RAW file.
                        There were also clouds in the background, although faint. Perhaps the faint contours/definitions of the clouds in the background could be mistaken for a dust spot, as I don't really see anything out of the ordinary.
                        This photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9988157 was taken 3 hours prior to the rejected image, as you can see it was cloudy that day. The sun just peaked through the clouds allowing me to get some sunset light on the PC12, which is why I took the picture.
                        Here is a "before" picture with my edits. I wanted to make the sunset light as crisp as possible, which is why I added so much contrast:
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.PNG
Views:	58
Size:	200.1 KB
ID:	1106250
                        Regards,
                        Ben Long
                        Color is fine for me, as I said. There is a dust spot that I did not see, so rejection is valid for that reason.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                          Color is fine for me, as I said. There is a dust spot that I did not see, so rejection is valid for that reason.
                          Okay thank you. Could you please point out the dust spot?

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Ben Long View Post

                            Okay thank you. Could you please point out the dust spot?
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	image_37101.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	718.1 KB
ID:	1106282

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Okay thanks.
                              This photo, which you also pre-screened, was rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8757814
                              Any thoughts?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
                                Okay thanks.
                                This photo, which you also pre-screened, was rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8757814
                                Any thoughts?
                                Some light editing halos are visible around the tail.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X