Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening request - Ben Long

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Do you find this better?
    Blurry and oversharpened.

    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Or should I try 1280px.
    Not even sure that would hide it, but you could try.​

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Soft/blurry.
    Hi dlowwa,

    Do you find this better?
    Or should I try 1280px.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Dear sceeners,

    Requesting prescreening for the following image:

    regards,
    Soft/blurry.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Dear sceeners,

    Requesting prescreening for the following image:

    regards,
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post

    Dlowwa,

    I must say, that is a bit ridiculous. I’m not looking for comment on the actual photo - I’m pointing out there is no objectivity or logic to the rejection or acceptance pattern of these photos. There is no consistency and you just opt to hide whatever issues exist behind the defence of “we will not comment on already appealed images” because that is easier than looking at what went wrong.
    Your opinion is noted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    As already mentioned, please read here carefully:

    As there seem to be some unwritten rules that are missed by newer users, here are a few suggestions for when you would like editing advice/prescreening from the crew: If asking for prescreening/editing advice, please title your thread "(username) - prescreening request / editing advice" Prescreening is offered


    Images that have already been appealed will no longer be commented on by crew.
    Dlowwa,

    I must say, that is a bit ridiculous. I’m not looking for comment on the actual photo - I’m pointing out there is no objectivity or logic to the rejection or acceptance pattern of these photos. There is no consistency and you just opt to hide whatever issues exist behind the defence of “we will not comment on already appealed images” because that is easier than looking at what went wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    As already mentioned, please read here carefully:

    As there seem to be some unwritten rules that are missed by newer users, here are a few suggestions for when you would like editing advice/prescreening from the crew: If asking for prescreening/editing advice, please title your thread "(username) - prescreening request / editing advice" Prescreening is offered


    Images that have already been appealed will no longer be commented on by crew.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Hi,

    Recently, I uploaded a stack of 4 images which I captured at YSTW - all of which were new regs.

    This image was accepted:

    24-8182. Cessna 162 SkyCatcher. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    These two images were rejected, both for being undersharpened and heat distortion, and both were accepted after appeal:

    VH-ZEO. Cessna T337G Skymaster. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!



    VH-OTC. Piper PA-28R-200 Arrow. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!



    This image was rejected for heat haze only, and the appeal was rejected:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1843.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	668.9 KB
ID:	1169936
    When the three images were rejected I was confused as I had a good look at these images during editing, and didn't think there was any disruptive heat distortion over the aircraft itself.
    Also, in the lineup of aircraft, the rejected aircraft was 2nd in the lineup of the 4 aircraft, and I was in virtually the same position. Given heat haze logically worsens the further away you are from a subject (and also given the surface that they are on, but all the aircraft were on grass), it doesn't really make sense that the rejected image has "Clear heat distortion everywhere" (from appeal comments) when the other three do not.

    Kind regards,

    Ben Long​

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Hi screeners,

    It's been a while

    I'd like to request prescreening on the following images:
    Not sure the quality is there for 1920pix, except on maybe #4.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Hi screeners,

    It's been a while

    I'd like to request prescreening on the following images:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC6136.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1168338Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3691.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	1.38 MB
ID:	1168341​​Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3674.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1168340Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC4207.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1168339Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC5742.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	1.69 MB
ID:	1168342​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Hi screeners,

    Could I please request pre-screening on these images.
    Awkward crop on 4 and harsh contrast on 5. Otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Hi screeners,

    Could I please request pre-screening on these images.

    Many thanks. Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC7460.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	365.7 KB
ID:	1134418Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC5865.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	383.5 KB
ID:	1134419Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC5827.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	527.1 KB
ID:	1134420Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1522.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	656.5 KB
ID:	1134421Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9128.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	829.9 KB
ID:	1134422

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Long time no see

    Could I please get some pre-screening on these photos:
    Borderline heat haze on 2-3, but otherwise would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Long
    replied
    Long time no see

    Could I please get some pre-screening on these photos: Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC7523.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	535.2 KB
ID:	1131470Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC7901.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	536.1 KB
ID:	1131471Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC7862.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	578.3 KB
ID:	1131472Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC7897.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	817.2 KB
ID:	1131473Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC7932.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	581.5 KB
ID:	1131474

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben Long View Post
    Hi screeners,
    Could you please pre-screen these images:
    Contrast is a bit harsh, but otherwise would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X