If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I must say, that is a bit ridiculous. I’m not looking for comment on the actual photo - I’m pointing out there is no objectivity or logic to the rejection or acceptance pattern of these photos. There is no consistency and you just opt to hide whatever issues exist behind the defence of “we will not comment on already appealed images” because that is easier than looking at what went wrong.
As there seem to be some unwritten rules that are missed by newer users, here are a few suggestions for when you would like editing advice/prescreening from the crew:
If asking for prescreening/editing advice, please title your thread "(username) - prescreening request / editing advice"
Prescreening is offered
Images that have already been appealed will no longer be commented on by crew.
Dlowwa,
I must say, that is a bit ridiculous. I’m not looking for comment on the actual photo - I’m pointing out there is no objectivity or logic to the rejection or acceptance pattern of these photos. There is no consistency and you just opt to hide whatever issues exist behind the defence of “we will not comment on already appealed images” because that is easier than looking at what went wrong.
As there seem to be some unwritten rules that are missed by newer users, here are a few suggestions for when you would like editing advice/prescreening from the crew:
If asking for prescreening/editing advice, please title your thread "(username) - prescreening request / editing advice"
Prescreening is offered
Images that have already been appealed will no longer be commented on by crew.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
When the three images were rejected I was confused as I had a good look at these images during editing, and didn't think there was any disruptive heat distortion over the aircraft itself.
Also, in the lineup of aircraft, the rejected aircraft was 2nd in the lineup of the 4 aircraft, and I was in virtually the same position. Given heat haze logically worsens the further away you are from a subject (and also given the surface that they are on, but all the aircraft were on grass), it doesn't really make sense that the rejected image has "Clear heat distortion everywhere" (from appeal comments) when the other three do not.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: