Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

new member prescreening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    what level sharpness is right for the originalClick image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6820 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1034081

    Comment


    • #17
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6820 (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	645.5 KB
ID:	1034082

      Also, is this good? I took the sharpness down and reduced some noise

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by bwn View Post
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]23180[/ATTACH]

        Also, is this good? I took the sharpness down and reduced some noise
        Better, yes.

        Comment


        • #19
          Do you also mind looking at this one as a night shot Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7586.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1034085
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by bwn View Post
            Do you also mind looking at this one as a night shot [ATTACH=CONFIG]23183[/ATTACH]
            Hey there,

            not a screener however id say the sunset shot and the Beechcraft are both soft, especially in the case of the Beechcraft. The Cessna and Beechcraft may also have contrast/lighting issues but I would wait for a more experienced screener/ member to give advice in regards to that,

            Hope this helps to some extent,
            Kindest Regards,

            Jordan W

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by bwn View Post
              Do you also mind looking at this one as a night shot [ATTACH=CONFIG]23183[/ATTACH]
              This is the third and probably last time I’m going to ask: please read this post thoroughly.

              https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

              #3 applies in this case.

              Comment


              • #22
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1089.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	27.2 KB
ID:	1034089

                WOuld this be an acceptable wing view?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by bwn View Post
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]23190[/ATTACH]

                  WOuld this be an acceptable wing view?
                  dust spots, noisy, compression

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bwn View Post
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23190[/ATTACH]

                    WOuld this be an acceptable wing view?
                    I guess you're not interested in getting advice from the crew?

                    *gives up*

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      I guess you're not interested in getting advice from the crew?

                      *gives up*

                      I’m sorry you feel this way, the opposite is true, I want you’re feedback, I’m just still getting accustomed to the forum

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        I guess you're not interested in getting advice from the crew?

                        *gives up*
                        Please don’t give up on me, I’m really trying to work with you here

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I've asked you to read the suggestions thread (and to try and follow those suggestions) at least three times, but it seems you have yet to do so. You are of course not required to do so, but if you're not going to take the time to do that simple courtesy, there's not much point in me spending my time trying to help any more.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                            I've asked you to read the suggestions thread (and to try and follow those suggestions) at least three times, but it seems you have yet to do so. You are of course not required to do so, but if you're not going to take the time to do that simple courtesy, there's not much point in me spending my time trying to help any more.

                            Alright, I’m sorry, I tend to only skim stuff and that’s my fault. I will make sure that I’m reading the entire content. I don’t want you to feel like helping me is a waste of time. So, please accept my apology and I’m happy to recover anybody’s help

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by bwn View Post
                              Alright, I’m sorry, I tend to only skim stuff and that’s my fault. I will make sure that I’m reading the entire content. I don’t want you to feel like helping me is a waste of time. So, please accept my apology and I’m happy to recover anybody’s help
                              Fair enough, but you can understand why just ‘skimming stuff’ might not inspire people to want to help or give advice? Why bother if that advice is just going to be skimmed over?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                                Fair enough, but you can understand why just ‘skimming stuff’ might not inspire people to want to help or give advice? Why bother if that advice is just going to be skimmed over?
                                And again, I’m really sorry Dana, it’s a lifelong habit that I’m trying to break, I completely understand your frustrations

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X