Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

editing/prescreening advise

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by floosypg View Post
    ok thank you , how about this?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28425[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28426[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28427[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28428[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28429[/ATTACH]
    All images likely to be rejected for contrast/color.

    Comment


    • #32
      hi, are this photos acceptable?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3304.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	759.4 KB
ID:	1042661
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3464.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	999.1 KB
ID:	1042662
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3749.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,018.6 KB
ID:	1042663
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4128.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	717.7 KB
ID:	1042664
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6705.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1042665
      thank you

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by floosypg View Post
        hi, are this photos acceptable?
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28518[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28519[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28520[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28521[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28522[/ATTACH]
        thank you
        1: dark
        2: OK
        3: Slightly leaning to the right
        4: borderline soft and noisy
        5. too noisy
        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

        Comment


        • #34
          how about this?
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3407.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1042702
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3408.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	905.9 KB
ID:	1042703
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4066.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	744.6 KB
ID:	1042704
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4091.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	976.6 KB
ID:	1042705
          thank you

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by floosypg View Post
            how about this?
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28561[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28562[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28563[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28564[/ATTACH]
            thank you
            hello ,with respect can i request prescreening advice for this photos?
            thank you

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by floosypg View Post
              hello ,with respect can i request prescreening advice for this photos?
              thank you
              1-2 heat haze, oversharpened
              3. ok
              4. contrast

              I generally avoid answering anyone who simply posts requests every 24 hours without asking for more specific feedback, or acknowledging the feedback that was given. Either space out your requests more, or try to be a bit more specific with your requests. See my reply (#3) here:

              https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

              Comment


              • #37
                hello, can i request precreening advice for this photos?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8398.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.16 MB
ID:	1042866
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8401.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1042867
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8423.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,009.3 KB
ID:	1042865
                and what categories can i put at photo number 3?
                thank you

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by floosypg View Post
                  hello, can i request precreening advice for this photos?
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]28757[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]28758[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]28756[/ATTACH]
                  and what categories can i put at photo number 3?
                  thank you
                  These would all be rejected for contrast and soft/heat haze. Don't think they are fixable.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    These would all be rejected for contrast and soft/heat haze. Don't think they are fixable.
                    ok thanks dana

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      hello, im searching for new angle for better photos. is this photos acceptable?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8136.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	954.3 KB
ID:	1042902

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by floosypg View Post
                        hello, im searching for new angle for better photos. is this photos acceptable?
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]28796[/ATTACH]
                        Slightly soft towards the nose, but otherwise ok.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those photos please.
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8597.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	839.0 KB
ID:	1042995
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8623.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,006.7 KB
ID:	1042996
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8634.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	833.5 KB
ID:	1042997
                          not sure about contrast for last 2 photos. thank you

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by floosypg View Post
                            Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those photos please.
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28907[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28908[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28909[/ATTACH]
                            not sure about contrast for last 2 photos. thank you
                            1: blurry, soft, lacks contrast
                            2: OK
                            3: dark, backlit. IMO irrecoverable
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                              1: blurry, soft, lacks contrast
                              2: OK
                              3: dark, backlit. IMO irrecoverable
                              thanks for your fast respond.
                              i want ask what is IMO irrecoverable?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by floosypg View Post
                                thanks for your fast respond.
                                i want ask what is IMO irrecoverable?
                                "IMO irrecoverable" means "In my opinion the photo can not be recovered", or in other words "it can not be fixed"
                                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X