Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    Looks better.
    Great, is it better enough to queue or are there any other issues I need to look at?

    Comment


    • Good Evening,

      I'd appreciate a pre-screening of the following please

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3782.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	658.5 KB
ID:	1043435 softness around the nose

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3819.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	551.4 KB
ID:	1043436 blurry/heat haze around the tail and possibly some editing halo's from sharpening.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3900.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	565.0 KB
ID:	1043437 softness around the nose

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3929.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	737.0 KB
ID:	1043438 contrast

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4010.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	602.0 KB
ID:	1043439 contrast

      Many Thanks

      Comment


      • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
        Good Evening,

        I'd appreciate a pre-screening of the following please

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29426[/ATTACH] softness around the nose

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29427[/ATTACH] blurry/heat haze around the tail and possibly some editing halo's from sharpening.

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29428[/ATTACH] softness around the nose

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29429[/ATTACH] contrast

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29430[/ATTACH] contrast

        Many Thanks
        A couple of them look a bit bright in spots, but sharpening/processing wouldn't be an issue for me.

        Comment


        • Good Evening,

          I have some more for prescreening please

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5428.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	244.9 KB
ID:	1074737 softness
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5539.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	238.5 KB
ID:	1074738would this be considered similar to another I have in the database https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9430200
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5630.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	272.2 KB
ID:	1074739contrast/exposure
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5635.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	223.6 KB
ID:	1074740softness, especially towards the rear of the aircraft
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5707.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	212.6 KB
ID:	1074741contrast/exposure

          Many Thanks

          Comment


          • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
            Good Evening,

            I have some more for prescreening please
            Not sure if it's something with the new forum format, as I've noticed it with another post today, but these images are all heavily compressed. Other than that, quality shouldn't be an issue. The previously accepted image is not similar.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              Not sure if it's something with the new forum format, as I've noticed it with another post today, but these images are all heavily compressed. Other than that, quality shouldn't be an issue. The previously accepted image is not similar.
              Thanks, I hope it is to do with the new format, as heavy compression isn't normally something I suffer from. I've attatched an image again image but left it at its natural upload size just to see if that makes a difference on the compression side for future reference.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5707.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	212.6 KB
ID:	1074789

              Comment


              • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post

                Thanks, I hope it is to do with the new format, as heavy compression isn't normally something I suffer from. I've attatched an image again image but left it at its natural upload size just to see if that makes a difference on the compression side for future reference.
                Through other research, I have found out that it is due to the new forum settings. We're working on that, and hope to have it fixed in the next few days.

                Comment


                • Good Evening,

                  I have a question with regard to similar images (saves me asking every time I have one I think may be similar).
                  Where do you call the line on this? My local airport is a single runway 09/27 so I'm assuming that any activity on one of these will be considered similar, but how about a take off from 27 and a landing on 09? (taken from the same spotting point) Are these different enough or is the fact that the airframe/airport combination is the same enough to render it similar?

                  Many Thanks

                  Dominic

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
                    Good Evening,

                    I have a question with regard to similar images (saves me asking every time I have one I think may be similar).
                    Where do you call the line on this? My local airport is a single runway 09/27 so I'm assuming that any activity on one of these will be considered similar, but how about a take off from 27 and a landing on 09? (taken from the same spotting point) Are these different enough or is the fact that the airframe/airport combination is the same enough to render it similar?

                    Many Thanks

                    Dominic
                    Generally same side, same phase of flight (in the air/on the ground) will be considered similar, so you could theoretically get 4 images of the same aircraft/location (2x air r/l side, 2x ground r/l side).

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                      Generally same side, same phase of flight (in the air/on the ground) will be considered similar, so you could theoretically get 4 images of the same aircraft/location (2x air r/l side, 2x ground r/l side).
                      Great thanks for letting me know, means I don't have to bother you for prescreening for similars.

                      Comment


                      • Good Evening,

                        Would you be so kind as to pre screen the following

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6024.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	858.1 KB
ID:	1075623

                        not sure about the crop on this one as well as it possibly being too soft.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6032.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1075624

                        Unsure about this one maybe being too soft and also it the glare would cause a rejection.

                        Thanks as always



                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
                          Good Evening,

                          Would you be so kind as to pre screen the following

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6024.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	858.1 KB
ID:	1075623

                          not sure about the crop on this one as well as it possibly being too soft.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6032.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1075624

                          Unsure about this one maybe being too soft and also it the glare would cause a rejection.

                          Thanks as always



                          Hi!

                          The close up is indeed too soft, also i would crop tighter too the wing. The 2nd Image would be acceptable for me - the glare isnīt an issue.

                          Regards.
                          Best Regards from Germany,
                          Julian S.​

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Julian S. View Post


                            Hi!

                            The close up is indeed too soft, also i would crop tighter too the wing. The 2nd Image would be acceptable for me - the glare isnīt an issue.

                            Regards.
                            Thanks,

                            Still working on the tight crops, trying to figure out what is acceptable and what isn't. I'll have another go when the weather improves in these parts.

                            Comment


                            • Hi all,

                              I'd be grateful if the following could be pre-screened

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6418.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	734.4 KB
ID:	1076115 Because of the lighting, I'm just generally unsure if this one is acceptable. If it is, am I correct in thinking night shot would apply to this one?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6765.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	910.4 KB
ID:	1076116 Possibly too soft at the nose.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6994.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	961.6 KB
ID:	1076117 Exposure

                              Of course, please point out if there are issues apart from the ones I am concerned about which I have missed.

                              Thanks

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
                                Hi all,

                                I'd be grateful if the following could be pre-screened

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6418.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	734.4 KB
ID:	1076115 Because of the lighting, I'm just generally unsure if this one is acceptable. If it is, am I correct in thinking night shot would apply to this one?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6765.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	910.4 KB
ID:	1076116 Possibly too soft at the nose.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6994.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	961.6 KB
ID:	1076117 Exposure

                                Of course, please point out if there are issues apart from the ones I am concerned about which I have missed.

                                Thanks
                                I like #1 and #3 and would accept them. #2 is borderline overexposed.
                                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X