Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by Julian S. View Post


    Hi!

    The close up is indeed too soft, also i would crop tighter too the wing. The 2nd Image would be acceptable for me - the glare isnīt an issue.

    Regards.
    Thanks,

    Still working on the tight crops, trying to figure out what is acceptable and what isn't. I'll have another go when the weather improves in these parts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    Would you be so kind as to pre screen the following

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6024.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	858.1 KB
ID:	1075623

    not sure about the crop on this one as well as it possibly being too soft.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6032.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1075624

    Unsure about this one maybe being too soft and also it the glare would cause a rejection.

    Thanks as always



    Hi!

    The close up is indeed too soft, also i would crop tighter too the wing. The 2nd Image would be acceptable for me - the glare isnīt an issue.

    Regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    Would you be so kind as to pre screen the following

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6024.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	858.1 KB
ID:	1075623

    not sure about the crop on this one as well as it possibly being too soft.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6032.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1075624

    Unsure about this one maybe being too soft and also it the glare would cause a rejection.

    Thanks as always



    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Generally same side, same phase of flight (in the air/on the ground) will be considered similar, so you could theoretically get 4 images of the same aircraft/location (2x air r/l side, 2x ground r/l side).
    Great thanks for letting me know, means I don't have to bother you for prescreening for similars.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I have a question with regard to similar images (saves me asking every time I have one I think may be similar).
    Where do you call the line on this? My local airport is a single runway 09/27 so I'm assuming that any activity on one of these will be considered similar, but how about a take off from 27 and a landing on 09? (taken from the same spotting point) Are these different enough or is the fact that the airframe/airport combination is the same enough to render it similar?

    Many Thanks

    Dominic
    Generally same side, same phase of flight (in the air/on the ground) will be considered similar, so you could theoretically get 4 images of the same aircraft/location (2x air r/l side, 2x ground r/l side).

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    I have a question with regard to similar images (saves me asking every time I have one I think may be similar).
    Where do you call the line on this? My local airport is a single runway 09/27 so I'm assuming that any activity on one of these will be considered similar, but how about a take off from 27 and a landing on 09? (taken from the same spotting point) Are these different enough or is the fact that the airframe/airport combination is the same enough to render it similar?

    Many Thanks

    Dominic

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post

    Thanks, I hope it is to do with the new format, as heavy compression isn't normally something I suffer from. I've attatched an image again image but left it at its natural upload size just to see if that makes a difference on the compression side for future reference.
    Through other research, I have found out that it is due to the new forum settings. We're working on that, and hope to have it fixed in the next few days.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Not sure if it's something with the new forum format, as I've noticed it with another post today, but these images are all heavily compressed. Other than that, quality shouldn't be an issue. The previously accepted image is not similar.
    Thanks, I hope it is to do with the new format, as heavy compression isn't normally something I suffer from. I've attatched an image again image but left it at its natural upload size just to see if that makes a difference on the compression side for future reference.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5707.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	212.6 KB
ID:	1074789

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I have some more for prescreening please
    Not sure if it's something with the new forum format, as I've noticed it with another post today, but these images are all heavily compressed. Other than that, quality shouldn't be an issue. The previously accepted image is not similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    I have some more for prescreening please

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5428.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	244.9 KB
ID:	1074737 softness
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5539.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	238.5 KB
ID:	1074738would this be considered similar to another I have in the database https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9430200
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5630.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	272.2 KB
ID:	1074739contrast/exposure
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5635.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	223.6 KB
ID:	1074740softness, especially towards the rear of the aircraft
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5707.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	212.6 KB
ID:	1074741contrast/exposure

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I'd appreciate a pre-screening of the following please

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29426[/ATTACH] softness around the nose

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29427[/ATTACH] blurry/heat haze around the tail and possibly some editing halo's from sharpening.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29428[/ATTACH] softness around the nose

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29429[/ATTACH] contrast

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29430[/ATTACH] contrast

    Many Thanks
    A couple of them look a bit bright in spots, but sharpening/processing wouldn't be an issue for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    I'd appreciate a pre-screening of the following please

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3782.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	658.5 KB
ID:	1043435 softness around the nose

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3819.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	551.4 KB
ID:	1043436 blurry/heat haze around the tail and possibly some editing halo's from sharpening.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3900.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	565.0 KB
ID:	1043437 softness around the nose

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3929.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	737.0 KB
ID:	1043438 contrast

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4010.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	602.0 KB
ID:	1043439 contrast

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    Looks better.
    Great, is it better enough to queue or are there any other issues I need to look at?

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    I have another shot from the sequence, it looks sharper to my eye at least.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29407[/ATTACH]

    This aircraft has been a particular pain for me so hopefully this one is better.
    Looks better.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    I have another shot from the sequence, it looks sharper to my eye at least.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6101.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	1043423

    This aircraft has been a particular pain for me so hopefully this one is better.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X