Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    I like #1 and #3 and would accept them. #2 is borderline overexposed.
    Thanks for the reply, I’ll have a play with #2 and see if I can sort the exposure.

    Am i correct in thinking night shot would apply to #1 or not?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post

      Thanks for the reply, I’ll have a play with #2 and see if I can sort the exposure.

      Am i correct in thinking night shot would apply to #1 or not?
      Correct! #1 needs Night Shot category.
      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

      Comment


      • Good Evening,

        I'm having another bash at an airport overview, hoping this one will be deemed acceptable. I've decided to focus on the tower and the western extension of the terminal building. Hopefully the fire tender will not be deemed detrimental to the image, sun only appeared briefly today and it just so happened that a runway inspection was taking place.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8048.jpg
Views:	160
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1076173

        As always, your thoughts are much appreciated.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
          Good Evening,

          I'm having another bash at an airport overview, hoping this one will be deemed acceptable. I've decided to focus on the tower and the western extension of the terminal building. Hopefully the fire tender will not be deemed detrimental to the image, sun only appeared briefly today and it just so happened that a runway inspection was taking place.
          Would be a motive rejection for me. The fire truck is too distracting/poorly frame, imho.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Would be a motive rejection for me. The fire truck is too distracting/poorly frame, imho.
            That’s fair enough, it is quite prominent in the frame. Apart from that is the framing/motive acceptable? If so I’ll persevere and get a clean shot when conditions permit.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post

              That’s fair enough, it is quite prominent in the frame. Apart from that is the framing/motive acceptable? If so I’ll persevere and get a clean shot when conditions permit.
              It's a subjective thing, so can't say definitively, but the potential for an acceptable image is there I think.

              Comment


              • Good Evening,

                I have a batch for pre-screening if you would please

                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4089.jpg
Views:	172
Size:	665.2 KB
ID:	1076720 contrast
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4202.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	767.3 KB
ID:	1076721 contrast/possible overediting
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4327.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	815.0 KB
ID:	1076723 soft and contrast
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4351.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	766.7 KB
ID:	1076724 contrast
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4371.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	766.0 KB
ID:	1076725 contrast

                Thank you
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
                  Good Evening,

                  I have a batch for pre-screening if you would please

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4089.jpg
Views:	172
Size:	665.2 KB
ID:	1076720 contrast
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4202.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	767.3 KB
ID:	1076721 contrast/possible overediting
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4327.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	815.0 KB
ID:	1076723 soft and contrast
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4351.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	766.7 KB
ID:	1076724 contrast
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4371.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	766.0 KB
ID:	1076725 contrast

                  Thank you
                  They look OK here.
                  My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                  Comment


                  • Good afternoon,

                    I have a couple of potential hot photos I'd appreciate a look over.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8402.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1076885 contrast with this one as light was a bit iffy. Also if this is acceptable, do I submit it under Ryanair (as per livery) or Air Malta (the registered owner)

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8387.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	1,011.1 KB
ID:	1076886 Again the light on this one is poor, just wondering what the chances are considering this aircraft has now been painted in the new livery.

                    Many Thanks and Happy Christmas

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
                      Good afternoon,

                      I have a couple of potential hot photos I'd appreciate a look over.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8402.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1076885 contrast with this one as light was a bit iffy. Also if this is acceptable, do I submit it under Ryanair (as per livery) or Air Malta (the registered owner)

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8387.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	1,011.1 KB
ID:	1076886 Again the light on this one is poor, just wondering what the chances are considering this aircraft has now been painted in the new livery.

                      Many Thanks and Happy Christmas
                      #1 looks a tad soft, but is acceptable to me, #2 looks somewhat dark to me

                      Merry Xmas to you too!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by pdeboer View Post

                        #1 looks a tad soft, but is acceptable to me, #2 looks somewhat dark to me

                        Merry Xmas to you too!
                        Have had a go at brightening #2 as much as i dare without ruining it. Normally I wouldn't bother but as it is an update to the livery I'm persevering.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8387.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1076898

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post

                          Have had a go at brightening #2 as much as i dare without ruining it. Normally I wouldn't bother but as it is an update to the livery I'm persevering.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8387.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1076898
                          Very borderline for color & contrast.

                          Comment


                          • Good Evening,

                            I had the following image rejected for being dark/underexposed https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7769147

                            Have had a crack at brightening it up now, would this be acceptable?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6418.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	794.9 KB
ID:	1077228
                            Many Thanks

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
                              Good Evening,

                              I had the following image rejected for being dark/underexposed https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7769147

                              Have had a crack at brightening it up now, would this be acceptable?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6418.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	794.9 KB
ID:	1077228
                              Many Thanks
                              Would be acceptable for me.

                              Comment


                              • Good Afternoon,

                                I've had the following rejection for over processed/bad processing and wrong info.

                                JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                                I'm assuming that i forgot to tick the biz jet box for the wrong info, but I cannot see where/how my processing rejection has come from. Not doubting the rejection, I just cannot see what I have done wrong. Any advice on this would be appreciated.

                                Regards

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X