Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DominicHall
    replied
    Hmm compression isn't something I usually suffer from, and I havn't changed my workflow. That said, the issue is sort of irrelevent due to the softness. I'll have a look at another from the sequence tomorrow and see if I have anything better.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I'd appreciate a pre screen on this one, I'm unsure on the contrast and am struggling on a centering front.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29387[/ATTACH]

    Thanks
    Contrast is ok, and maybe slightly low in the frame, but bigger issues with compression and softness.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    I'd appreciate a pre screen on this one, I'm unsure on the contrast and am struggling on a centering front.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6093.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	609.1 KB
ID:	1043407

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Hi,

    could the following please be pre-screened.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29227[/ATTACH] not sure about the contrast on this one
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29228[/ATTACH] overexposure/glare
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29229[/ATTACH]overexposure/glare
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29230[/ATTACH]contrast/dark
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29231[/ATTACH]soft

    Many Thanks
    While the glare is a bit unattractive, I don't see it being a reason for rejection. No other major quality issues I can see.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Hi,

    could the following please be pre-screened.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3636.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	569.0 KB
ID:	1043267 not sure about the contrast on this one
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3665.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	493.9 KB
ID:	1043268 overexposure/glare
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3670.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	514.3 KB
ID:	1043269overexposure/glare
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3688.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	464.8 KB
ID:	1043270contrast/dark
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3699.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	544.7 KB
ID:	1043271soft

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. borderline overexposed/harsh contrast.
    2. ok for me
    Thank you Dana, and welcome back.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Thanks for the advice, I've had a go at re-working those 2 images, are they any better now?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29006[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29007[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline overexposed/harsh contrast.
    2. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Thanks for the advice, I've had a go at re-working those 2 images, are they any better now?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29006[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29007[/ATTACH]
    Hi all,

    any thoughts on the above edits?
    Appreciate the post may have initially been missed.

    Dominic

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: borderline dark, I would accept it
    4: a tad overexposed
    Thanks for the advice, I've had a go at re-working those 2 images, are they any better now?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3577.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	609.0 KB
ID:	1043077

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3619.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	542.5 KB
ID:	1043078

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I'd appreciate a pre-screen on the following 5 if you would:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28994[/ATTACH] possibly too dark and/or soft

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28995[/ATTACH] too soft

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28996[/ATTACH] too soft and maybe overexposed

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28997[/ATTACH] soft and overexposed also

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28998[/ATTACH] soft, especially at the nose

    Many Thanks
    1: borderline dark, I would accept it
    2: OK
    3: OK
    4: a tad overexposed
    5: OK

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    I'd appreciate a pre-screen on the following 5 if you would:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3577.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.9 KB
ID:	1043065 possibly too dark and/or soft

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3597.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	523.1 KB
ID:	1043066 too soft

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3613.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	534.1 KB
ID:	1043067 too soft and maybe overexposed

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3619.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	540.4 KB
ID:	1043068 soft and overexposed also

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4094.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	537.6 KB
ID:	1043069 soft, especially at the nose

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • cyx323
    replied
    Originally posted by chriscamille93mt View Post
    Any comments on this one? Due to the reflection on the Fuselage

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28912[/ATTACH]
    Please use your own thread for prescreening requests: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...editing-advice

    Leave a comment:


  • chriscamille93mt
    replied
    Great, Good day mate.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by chriscamille93mt View Post
    Any comments on this one? Due to the reflection on the Fuselage

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]28912[/ATTACH]
    Looks OK

    Leave a comment:


  • chriscamille93mt
    replied
    Any comments on this one? Due to the reflection on the Fuselage

    Click image for larger version

Name:	EK-B77W-A6ECF-19092919-IMG_9605.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1042999

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X