Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    You are correct, most likely a dark/contrast rejection.
    thanks for the confirmation

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I'd be greateful if somebody could pre-screen the following.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9817.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	758.4 KB
ID:	1080361
    I'm thinking the contrast just isnt there, but it could just be my eyes.

    Many thanks
    You are correct, most likely a dark/contrast rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening,

    I'd be greateful if somebody could pre-screen the following.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9817.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	758.4 KB
ID:	1080361
    I'm thinking the contrast just isnt there, but it could just be my eyes.

    Many thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Afternoon,

    Could I please have the following pre-screened

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9180.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	674.9 KB
ID:	1079280 concerned with contrast and exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9186.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	966.3 KB
ID:	1079281 also contrast and exposure

    Thanks
    1. soft/blurry
    2. soft

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Afternoon,

    Could I please have the following pre-screened

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9180.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	674.9 KB
ID:	1079280 concerned with contrast and exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9186.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	966.3 KB
ID:	1079281 also contrast and exposure

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Hi, this one looks sharper to me, although I had a dust spot in a rather inconvenient place which was a pig to remove. Hopefully it will be ok on both fronts.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9037.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1078921

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    OK, I took several throughout the day in between movements so I'll have a look and see if I have anything sharper.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening All,

    Had another go at a terminal/overview shot, this time with no unsightly distractions. Would be grateful to hear your opinions of this one.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9039.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1078830

    Many Thanks
    Somewhat soft, but motive would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Evening All,

    Had another go at a terminal/overview shot, this time with no unsightly distractions. Would be grateful to hear your opinions of this one.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9039.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1078830

    Many Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    I don't know, who it was. But I think I can speak for all screeners: "You're welcome. And please do us all a favour and select the correct categories next time "
    I will, my first couple with a special livery so I didn't know it was there. Should have read it a little closer I think

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Just a quick thank you to whichever screener processed my last batch and added the 'special livery' category for me rather than rejecting them. It's much appreciated.
    I don't know, who it was. But I think I can speak for all screeners: "You're welcome. And please do us all a favour and select the correct categories next time "

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Just a quick thank you to whichever screener processed my last batch and added the 'special livery' category for me rather than rejecting them. It's much appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Afternoon,

    I've had the following rejection for over processed/bad processing and wrong info.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7784661

    I'm assuming that i forgot to tick the biz jet box for the wrong info, but I cannot see where/how my processing rejection has come from. Not doubting the rejection, I just cannot see what I have done wrong. Any advice on this would be appreciated.

    Regards
    Was rejected for categories, not bad info - yes, because missing biz jet. As for the processing, can't see anything wrong myself, so just try it again with the correct categories selected.

    Leave a comment:


  • DominicHall
    replied
    Good Afternoon,

    I've had the following rejection for over processed/bad processing and wrong info.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7784661

    I'm assuming that i forgot to tick the biz jet box for the wrong info, but I cannot see where/how my processing rejection has come from. Not doubting the rejection, I just cannot see what I have done wrong. Any advice on this would be appreciated.

    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DominicHall View Post
    Good Evening,

    I had the following image rejected for being dark/underexposed https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7769147

    Have had a crack at brightening it up now, would this be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6418.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	794.9 KB
ID:	1077228
    Many Thanks
    Would be acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X