Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reuben Morison - Prescreening/editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9321234
    I'm guessing the same case for this, two years again
    Should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9321234
    I'm guessing the same case for this, two years again
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Would be adequate for me.
    Great, thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post

    Two years in this case.
    Would be adequate for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Would likely depend on the time between the photos. Same day/week/month, probably yes. Separate by a few years, probably no.
    Two years in this case.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post
    Would likely depend on the time between the photos. Same day/week/month, probably yes. Separate by a few years, probably no.

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Are these similar?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9311846
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Would these be contrast rejects? All first of reg/different aircraft on same reg
    Any other issues?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post
    Any issues with this?
    Image is quite soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Any issues with this?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Soft and a bit dark. Last one doesn't work quite as well as the others as silhouette shots typically need a large part of the frame to be the sky.
    I find it more interesting personally since it's different. Personal preference I guess

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post
    How about these?
    Soft and a bit dark. Last one doesn't work quite as well as the others as silhouette shots typically need a large part of the frame to be the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    How about these?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post
    Do you still want whites on the Histo to be as white as a day shot or a bit darker
    Honestly, I don't usually bother with the histogram unless I suspect there is a problem. I can tell just be looking that these will be rejected for being dark. These were not taken at midday, so obviously the exposure will not be the same as shots that were, nor is it worth comparing the histograms of the two types of images. You can take my advice that they need brightening or not, but they are likely to soft and noisy (especially if you do brighten them) to be accepted in any case.

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    Do you still want whites on the Histo to be as white as a day shot or a bit darker

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X