Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RobertLN - prescreening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Ok thanks for your time. I used the chimneys as vertical reference and using your horizon checker I can see that they are almost perfectly parallel to the yellow grid lines. The image horizon must be therefore perpendicular to them and so parallel to the real horizon. I want to know if my approach is not correct and if I am doing something systematically wrong. Thanks again, much appreciated. [ATTACH=CONFIG]24718[/ATTACH]
    Better to use the buildings themselves, but honestly, the horizon check function is not that reliable for very short vertical references like that because the way pixel extrapolation works at such a low resolution will make almost anything look straight.

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    Ok thanks for your time. I used the chimneys as vertical reference and using your horizon checker I can see that they are almost perfectly parallel to the yellow grid lines. The image horizon must be therefore perpendicular to them and so parallel to the real horizon. I want to know if my approach is not correct and if I am doing something systematically wrong. Thanks again, much appreciated. Click image for larger version

Name:	Bildschirmfoto 2019-05-22 um 08.03.52.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	16.5 KB
ID:	1035341

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Yesterday I got a rejection which I still dont understand. Appeal got rejected. 'Needs clockwise rotation, everything is leaning to the left'. Thoughts about this? I disagree that everything is leaning to the left. I see much worse on the DB and I know thats not a valid argument here. I still find it frustrating. No chance for a late approval? Thanks for your time
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7316363
    I will be the fourth senior screener to look at this (two original screeners, plus one who handled the appeal) and I also agree there is a slight lean to the left with the background verticals. A small amount of CW rotation should fix this.

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    Yesterday I got a rejection which I still dont understand. Appeal got rejected. 'Needs clockwise rotation, everything is leaning to the left'. Thoughts about this? I disagree that everything is leaning to the left. I see much worse on the DB and I know thats not a valid argument here. I still find it frustrating. No chance for a late approval? Thanks for your time
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7316363

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Thanks a ton! I have learned so much and I have finally somewhat of a success here on this site. I got 4 more for prescreen ( specially in regards to contrast). Thanks [ATTACH=CONFIG]24623[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24624[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24625[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24626[/ATTACH]
    1. contrast
    2-3 ok
    4. borderline dark

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    Thanks a ton! I have learned so much and I have finally somewhat of a success here on this site. I got 4 more for prescreen ( specially in regards to contrast). Thanks Click image for larger version

Name:	EDHH-D-ATUH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	900.3 KB
ID:	1035258Click image for larger version

Name:	EDHH-N276EA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1035259Click image for larger version

Name:	EDHH-OY-NCU-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1035260Click image for larger version

Name:	EDHH-TC-TLD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	943.9 KB
ID:	1035261

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Thank you for the feedback so far! I learned a lot. I took some new ones. How are these? [ATTACH=CONFIG]24398[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24399[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24400[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24401[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]24402[/ATTACH]
    Slight red cast on 1-3 & 5; 4 has editing halos visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    Thank you for the feedback so far! I learned a lot. I took some new ones. How are these? Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-D-ABOB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1035071Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-EI-DPH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	1035072Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-N640GT-8.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1035073Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-OH-LKL.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	735.2 KB
ID:	1035074 Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-EP-IJB-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,008.2 KB
ID:	1035075

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Hey there, I have some more photos I would like to have some feedback on. Thank you! [ATTACH=CONFIG]24300[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]24301[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24302[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24303[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24304[/ATTACH]
    Borderline contrast/heat haze on a couple of them, but would all be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    Hey there, I have some more photos I would like to have some feedback on. Thank you! Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-EC-MAI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	862.2 KB
ID:	1034990 Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-EI-FGH.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	851.5 KB
ID:	1034991Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-G-FBJA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	926.2 KB
ID:	1034992Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-PH-BGN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	893.7 KB
ID:	1034993Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-PH-HSK-new.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1034994

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Swiss is backlit and 757 maybe needs a bit of CCW rotation. Rest looks ok

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    I shot some new photos at LEAL Alicante. How are these? ThanksClick image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-9H-BOO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	627.2 KB
ID:	1034921Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-G-LSAB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,005.2 KB
ID:	1034922Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-HB-JCR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	947.1 KB
ID:	1034923Click image for larger version

Name:	LEAL-OY-RUU.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	564.3 KB
ID:	1034924

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Thanks so much for the help thus far. Here are some more. Trying to improve my editing. [ATTACH=CONFIG]23980[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23981[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23982[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23983[/ATTACH]
    Contrast a bit flat on #3, but otherwise quality looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertLN
    replied
    Thanks so much for the help thus far. Here are some more. Trying to improve my editing. Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-EC-IZR.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	825.2 KB
ID:	1034719Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-OH-LVK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	879.1 KB
ID:	1034720Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-PH-EZZ.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1034721Click image for larger version

Name:	EDDH-TC-JIN.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	831.3 KB
ID:	1034722

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertLN View Post
    Hey there, I have some more photos I would like to have some feedback on. Thank you! [ATTACH=CONFIG]23866[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23867[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23868[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]23869[/ATTACH]
    First would be a contrast rejection; last two maybe a touch bright, but should be ok.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X